Published online December 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 6 December 2006, pp. e1836-e1844 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2006-1327)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, J. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Survival Rates and Mode of Delivery for Vertex Preterm Neonates According to Small- or Appropriate-for-Gestational-Age Status

Henry Chong Lee, MD and Jeffrey B. Gould, MD, MPH

Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

OBJECTIVE. The goal was to characterize the relationship between cesarean section delivery and death for preterm vertex neonates according to intrauterine growth.

METHODS. Maternal and infant data from the National Center for Health Statistics for 1999 and 2000 were analyzed. Neonates with gestational ages of 26 to 36 weeks were characterized as small for gestational age (<10th percentile) or appropriate for gestational age (10th to 90th percentile). Mortality rates at 28 days and relative risks were calculated for each gestational age group according to mode of delivery.

RESULTS. Cesarean section rates were higher for small-for-gestational-age neonates compared with appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates, most prominently from 26 weeks to 32 weeks of gestation, at which small-for-gestational-age neonates had cesarean section rates of 50% to 67%, whereas appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates had rates of 22% to 38%. Small-for-gestational-age neonates at gestational ages of <31 weeks had increased survival rates associated with cesarean section, whereas small-for-gestational-age neonates at >33 weeks and appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates overall had decreased survival rates associated with cesarean section. After adjustment for sociodemographic and medical factors, the survival advantage for small-for-gestational-age neonates at gestational ages of 26 to 30 weeks persisted.

CONCLUSIONS. Cesarean section delivery was associated with survival for preterm small-for-gestational-age neonates but not preterm appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates. We speculate that vaginal delivery may be particularly stressful for small-for-gestational-age neonates. We found no evidence that prematurity alone is a valid indication for cesarean section for preterm appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates.

Key Words: birth weight • survival • gestational age • cesarean section

Abbreviations: NCHS—National Center for Health Statistics • CI—confidence interval • OR—odds ratio • RR—relative risk • SGA—small for gestational age • AGA—appropriate for gestational age • VLBW—very low birth weight

Accepted Jul 14, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. L. Drevenstedt, E. M. Crimmins, S. Vasunilashorn, and C. E. Finch
The rise and fall of excess male infant mortality
PNAS, April 1, 2008; 105(13): 5016 - 5021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]