Published online December 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 6 December 2006, pp. 2313-2321 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1570)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayer, M. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Are We There Yet? Distance to Care and Relative Supply Among Pediatric Medical Subspecialties

Michelle L. Mayer, PhD, MPH

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research and Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to describe geographic proximity, quantify variation in supply, and estimate pediatric population increments that are needed to support providers across pediatric subspecialties.

METHODS. Data from the American Board of Pediatrics and the Claritas Pop-Facts Database were used to calculate subspecialty-specific straight-line distances between each zip code and the nearest board-certified subspecialist. These data sources also were used to estimate the percentage of hospital referral regions with providers and calculate physician-to-population ratios for each of 16 pediatric medical subspecialties. Coefficients of variation for the ratios were used to assess intraspecialty variation in supply across markets. Estimates of the pediatric population that is needed to support an initial or additional physician in a market were generated using subspecialty-specific ordered logit analyses.

RESULTS. The population-weighted average distance to a subspecialist ranged from 15 miles for neonatology to 78 miles for pediatric sports medicine. For most pediatric subspecialties, more than two thirds of children live within 40 miles of a certified physician. For 7 of 16 of pediatric subspecialties, fewer than one half of hospital referral regions have a provider. Coefficients of variation vary across subspecialties and are lowest for neonatology at 76% and greatest for pediatric sports medicine at 287%. Pediatric population thresholds likewise vary with a tendency toward lower thresholds for procedural specialties, such as cardiology and critical care medicine.

CONCLUSIONS. The practice locations of pediatric subspecialists parallel the geographic distribution of children in the United States, yet many hospital referral regions lack pediatric subspecialists and coefficients of variation vary widely across subspecialties. These findings suggest that either the supply of pediatric subspecialists is inadequate, pediatric subspecialists are distributed inequitably, or the market for pediatric subspecialists is larger than the hospital referral regions. Furthermore, population thresholds for many cognitive pediatric subspecialties are high; the extent to which high thresholds reflect low disease prevalence versus other factors, such as inadequate reimbursement, is not established.

Key Words: pediatric subspecialty care • workforce analysis • geographic access to care

Abbreviations: ABP—American Board of Pediatrics • HRR—hospital referral region • COV—coefficient of variation

Accepted Aug 29, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
G. L. Freed, K. M. Dunham, K. E. Switalski, M. D. Jones Jr, G. A. McGuinness, and and the Research Advisory Committee of the America
Recently Trained General Pediatricians: Perspectives on Residency Training and Scope of Practice
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S38 - S43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. E. Wegner, C. R. Lathren, C. G. Humble, M. L. Mayer, J. Feaganes, and A. D. Stiles
A Medical Home for Children With Insulin-Dependent Diabetes: Comanagement by Primary and Subspecialty Physicians--Convergence and Divergence of Opinions
Pediatrics, August 1, 2008; 122(2): e383 - e387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. Z. Kuo, T. L. Cheng, and P. C. Rowe
Successful Use of a Primary Care Practice Specialty Collaboration in the Care of an Adolescent With Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(6): e1536 - e1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. C. Goodman
The Pediatric Subspecialty Workforce: Time to Test Our Assumptions
Pediatrics, December 1, 2006; 118(6): 2545 - 2547.
[Full Text] [PDF]