Published online November 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 5 November 2006, pp. e1369-e1380 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2345)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Copeland, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, T. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity

ARTICLE

Compliance With American Academy of Pediatrics and American Public Health Association Illness Exclusion Guidelines for Child Care Centers in Maryland: Who Follows Them and When?

Kristen A. Copeland, MDa, Emily N. Harris, MD, MPHb, Nae-Yuh Wang, PhDc and Tina L. Cheng, MD, MPHd

a Division of General and Community Pediatrics Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
b Housestaff Department, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
c Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
d Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

BACKGROUND. In 1992, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Public Health Association jointly published guidelines for temporary exclusion of sick children from child care. However, little is known about key stakeholders' compliance with these guidelines.

OBJECTIVES. The purpose of this work was to compare pediatricians', parents', and child care providers' compliance with American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines and determine predictors for higher rates of compliance.

METHODS. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 215 randomly selected Maryland pediatricians, 223 parents, and 192 child care providers from 22 Baltimore, Maryland, child care centers from January to July 2004. Questionnaires contained the following 6 case vignettes depicting common child care illnesses: upper respiratory infection, conjunctivitis, gastroenteritis, mild febrile illness, tinea capitis, and atopic dermatitis. The instrument measured the correctness of exclusion and inclusion decisions (using American Academy of Pediatrics/American Public Health Association guidelines as gold standard) according to varying levels of fever, disease severity (eg, clear versus yellow eye discharge), familiarity with the child, and parent work schedule flexibility.

RESULTS. Response rates were 71% for pediatricians, 56% for parents, and 85% for child care providers. Guideline compliance was higher for pediatricians (74%) than for child care providers (60%) and parents (61%). Only 23% of pediatricians and parents and 29% of child care providers reported familiarity with American Academy of Pediatrics/American Public Health Association guidelines by name. In general, child care providers and parents had lower false-negative rates (allowed fewer children to attend who met criteria for exclusion) than pediatricians, suggesting that pediatricians may underexclude. Child care providers and parents correctly excluded in 65%–98% of cases requiring exclusion, whereas pediatricians correctly excluded 31%–86% of cases requiring exclusion, depending on the vignette. Yet pediatricians were much more specific about which children met criteria (pediatricians correctly included 61%–93% of cases requiring inclusion versus child care providers and parents who correctly included 20%–75% of such cases), suggesting that child care providers and parents may overexclude. Compliance rates varied significantly by stakeholder, vignette (disease), level of fever, and disease severity but did not vary with the stakeholder's familiarity with the child or the flexibility of the parent's work schedule.

CONCLUSIONS. Pediatricians, parents, and child care providers were unfamiliar with American Academy of Pediatrics/American Public Health Association illness exclusion guidelines by name but moderately compliant with them. When noncompliant, child care providers and parents generally overexcluded, and pediatricians underexcluded. Stakeholder- and disease-specific predictors for noncompliance gleaned from this study suggest how educational interventions aiming to increase guideline compliance could be individually tailored to child care providers, parents, and pediatricians.

Key Words: exclusion • infection control • child care • health policy

Abbreviations: AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics • APHA—American Public Health Association • CCP—child care provider • URI—upper respiratory infection

Accepted Jun 5, 2006.