Advertising Disclaimer
Published online November 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 5 November 2006, pp. 1880-1887 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1019)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cloutier, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cloutier, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, C. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Asthma
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Asthma Guideline Use by Pediatricians in Private Practices and Asthma Morbidity

Michelle M. Cloutier, MDa,b, Dorothy B. Wakefield, MSb, Pamela Sangeloty-Higgins, MS, MPHb, Steven Delaronde, MPH, MSWc, Charles B. Hall, PhDd

a Asthma Center, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut
b Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
c ConnectiCare, Farmington, Connecticut
d Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

OBJECTIVE. We sought to examine whether pediatric clinicians in private, non–health maintenance organization practices could implement the national asthma guidelines and whether, when implemented, these guidelines would decrease medical services utilization and improve asthma care for children.

METHODS. A trial of a disease management program (Easy Breathing II) involving 20 private pediatric practices in the greater Hartford, Connecticut area was conducted between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2003. Demographic data on participating practitioners and patients were obtained from questionnaires. Medical services utilization data from claims were obtained from ConnectiCare, a regional managed care organization.

RESULTS. Of the 16750 children enrolled in Easy Breathing II, 2458 were enrolled in ConnectiCare and 490 had asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid use increased in the community overall during the study period. After enrollment in Easy Breathing II, with adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity, asthma severity, season, and calendar year, children with persistent asthma experienced an additional 47% increase in inhaled corticosteroid use, a 56% reduction in outpatient visits, and a 91% decrease in emergency department visits for treatment of asthma. Adherence to national asthma guidelines for prescribing inhaled corticosteroids was 95%. Seventeen of the 20 practices are still using Easy Breathing, 5 years after program implementation.

CONCLUSIONS. Pediatric primary care clinicians in private practice settings can implement an asthma management program patterned after the national asthma guidelines. When implemented, this program is successful in reducing medical services utilization for children with asthma. Just as differences in patterns of medical services utilization exist in private practices, compared with urban clinics, the impact of disease management on medical services utilization differs in private practices, compared with urban clinics.


Key Words: Easy Breathing • disease management • children • National Asthma Education and Prevention Program • medical services utilization • claims data

Abbreviations: NAEPP—National Asthma Education and Prevention Program • EPR—Expert Panel Report • ED—emergency department • ICS—inhaled corticosteroid • MCO—managed care organization • CI—confidence interval


Accepted Jun 13, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
A. L. Pai and D. Drotar
Treatment Adherence Impact: The Systematic Assessment and Quantification of the Impact of Treatment Adherence on Pediatric Medical and Psychological Outcomes
J. Pediatr. Psychol., August 26, 2009; (2009) jsp073v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. V. James and S. Rosenbaum
Paying for Quality Care: Implications for Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities in Pediatric Asthma
Pediatrics, March 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_3): S205 - S210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]