ARTICLE |
a Centre for Community Child Health
h Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit
i Centre for Adolescent Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
b Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Australia
c Speech Language and Hearing Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
d Hearing Research Group
e Department of Philosophy
f Department of Otolaryngology
g Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
OBJECTIVE. The goal was to determine the prevalence and effects of slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss among children in elementary school.
METHODS. A cross-sectional, cluster-sample survey of 6581 children (response: 85%; grade 1: n = 3367; grade 5: n = 3214) in 89 schools in Melbourne, Australia, was performed. Slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was defined as a low-frequency pure-tone average across 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and/or a high-frequency pure-tone average across 3, 4, and 6 kHz of 16 to 40 dB hearing level in the better ear, with air/bone-conduction gaps of <10 dB. Parents reported children's health-related quality of life and behavior. Each child with slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, matched to 2 normally hearing children (low-frequency pure-tone average and high-frequency pure-tone average of
15 dB hearing level in both ears), completed standardized assessments. Whole-sample comparisons were adjusted for type of school, grade level, and gender, and matched-sample comparisons were adjusted for nonverbal IQ scores.
RESULTS. Fifty-five children (0.88%) had slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Children with and without sensorineural hearing loss scored similarly in language (mean: 97.2 vs 99.7), reading (101.1 vs 102.8), behavior (8.4 vs 7.0), and parent- and child-reported child health-related quality of life (77.6 vs 80.0 and 76.1 vs 77.0, respectively), but phonologic short-term memory was poorer (91.0 vs 102.8) in the sensorineural hearing loss group.
CONCLUSIONS. The prevalence of slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss was lower than reported in previous studies. There was no strong evidence that slight/mild bilateral sensorineural hearing loss affects adversely language, reading, behavior, or health-related quality of life in children who are otherwise healthy and of normal intelligence.
Key Words: child development language hearing loss prevalence outcomes
Abbreviations: SNHL—sensorineural hearing loss LPTA—low-frequency pure-tone average HPTA—high-frequency pure-tone average HRQoL—health-related quality of life CI—confidence interval NHANES—National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey HHANES—Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey UNHS—universal newborn hearing screening PTA—pure-tone average HL—hearing level
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Brunnberg, M. L. Bostrom, and M. Berglund Self-Rated Mental Health, School Adjustment, and Substance Use in Hard-of-Hearing Adolescents J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2008; 13(3): 324 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Tharpe Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss in Children: Past and Current Perspectives Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 7 - 15. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Tharpe and D. P. Sladen Causation of Permanent Unilateral and Mild Bilateral Hearing Loss in Children Trends in Amplification, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 17 - 25. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||