Published online October 2, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 4 October 2006, pp. 1371-1379 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-3214)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinkman, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Britto, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brinkman, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Britto, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ARTICLE

Evaluation of Resident Communication Skills and Professionalism: A Matter of Perspective?

William B. Brinkman, MD, Sheela R. Geraghty, MD, Bruce P. Lanphear, MD, MPH, Jane C. Khoury, MS, Javier A. Gonzalez del Rey, MD, Thomas G. DeWitt, MD and Maria T. Britto, MD, MPH

Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

OBJECTIVE. Evaluation procedures that rely solely on attending physician ratings may not identify residents who display poor communication skills or unprofessional behavior. Inclusion of non-physician evaluators should capture a more complete account of resident competency. No published reports have examined the relationship between resident evaluations obtained from different sources in pediatric settings. The objective of this study was to determine whether parent and nurse ratings of specific resident behaviors significantly differ from those of attending physicians.

METHODS. Thirty-six pediatric residents were evaluated by parents, nurses, and attending physicians during their first year of training. For analysis, the percentage of responses in the highest response category was calculated for each resident on each item. Differences between attending physician ratings and those of parents and nurses were compared using the signed rank test.

RESULTS. Parent and attending physician ratings were similar on most items, but attending physicians indicated that they frequently were unable to observe the behaviors of interest. Nurses rated residents lower than did attending physicians on items that related to respecting staff (69% vs 97%), accepting suggestions (56% vs 82%), teamwork (63% vs 88%), being sensitive and empathetic (62% vs 85%), respecting confidentiality (73% vs 97%), demonstrating integrity (75% vs 92%), and demonstrating accountability (67% vs 83%). Nurse responses were higher than attending physicians on anticipating postdischarge needs (46% vs 25%) and effectively planning care (52% vs 33%).

CONCLUSIONS. Expanding resident evaluation procedures to include parents and nurses does enhance information that is gathered on resident communication skills and professionalism and may help to target specific behaviors for improvement. Additional research is needed to determine whether receiving feedback on parent and nurse evaluations will have a positive impact on resident competency.

Key Words: medical education • resident education/training • multisource feedback • patient–doctor communication • professionalism

Abbreviations: ABIM—American Board of Internal Medicine • PSQ—Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire

Accepted May 24, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
C. W. Lang, P. J. Smith, and L. F. Ross
Ethics and Professionalism in the Pediatric Curriculum: A Survey of Pediatric Program Directors
Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): 1143 - 1151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
L. K. Leslie
What Can Data Tell Us About the Quality and Relevance of Current Pediatric Residency Education?
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S50 - S55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. P. Zimmer, B. S. Solomon, G. K. Siberry, and J. R. Serwint
Continuity-Structured Clinical Observations: Assessing the Multiple-Observer Evaluation in a Pediatric Resident Continuity Clinic
Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): e1633 - e1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
W. B. Brinkman, S. R. Geraghty, B. P. Lanphear, J. C. Khoury, J. A. Gonzalez del Rey, T. G. DeWitt, and M. T. Britto
Effect of Multisource Feedback on Resident Communication Skills and Professionalism: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, January 1, 2007; 161(1): 44 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]