Published online August 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 2 August 2006, pp. e356-e362 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2589)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brody, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dalen, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brody, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dalen, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Asthma

ARTICLE

Family and Physician Influence on Asthma Research Participation Decisions for Adolescents: The Effects of Adolescent Gender and Research Risk

Janet L. Brody, PhDa, David G. Scherer, PhDb, Robert D. Annett, PhDc, Charles Turner, PhDa and Jeanne Dalen, MSa

a Center for Family and Adolescent Research, Oregon Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico
b Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
c University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

OBJECTIVE. There is considerable ethical and legal ambiguity surrounding the role of adolescents in the decision-making process for research participation. Depending on the nature of the study and the regulations involved, adolescents may have independent responsibility for providing informed consent, they may be asked to provide their assent, or they may be completely excluded from the decision-making process. This study examined parent and adolescent perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on adolescent research participation decisions, and examined whether perceptions of influence differed based on adolescent gender and level of research risk.

STUDY DESIGN: Adolescents (n = 36) with asthma and their parents reviewed 9 pediatric research protocols, decided whether they would choose to participate, rated the extent they would be responsible for the actual decision, and indicated the ability of family and physician to influence their decisions. Multivariate analyses of variance were used to evaluate differences in perceptions of decision-making authority and sources of influence on the decisions.

RESULTS: Adolescents were less willing to cede decision making authority to parents than parents anticipated. Parents and adolescents acknowledged a greater openness to influence from physicians than from family for above minimal risk studies. Parents were more willing to consider opinions from male adolescents.

CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents desire responsibility for research participation decisions, though parents may not share these views. Physicians’ views on research participation are important to families, especially for above minimal risk studies. Parents may grant more decision-making autonomy to adolescent males than to females. Researchers, physicians, and institutions play a key role in facilitating the ethical enrollment of adolescents into biomedical research. Educational, policy, and oversight processes that support both adolescent autonomy and parental responsibility for research participation decision-making in biomedical research are discussed.

Key Words: asthma drug therapy • biomedical research ethics • informed consent • adolescent assent • research participation decision making • adolescent • child • parents • female • humans • male • research support

Abbreviations: FDA—Food and Drug Administration • MANOVA—multivariate analyses of variance

Accepted Mar 7, 2006.