Published online August 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 2 August 2006, pp. 723-730 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2830)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leuthner, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Leuthner, S. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

ARTICLE

Assent for Treatment: Clinician Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice

K. Jane Lee, MDa, Peter L. Havens, MDa, Thomas T. Sato, MDb, George M. Hoffman, MDc and Steven R. Leuthner, MDa

a Departments of Pediatrics
b Surgery
c Anesthesia, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

OBJECTIVES. Our purpose for this work was to explore clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding assent for medical treatment and to compare current practice with existing American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines.

METHODS. One of the investigators administered a questionnaire to clinicians who perform procedures on children at an academic tertiary care pediatric hospital to assess knowledge of assent for medical treatment and familiarity with the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement on assent and to measure clinician attitudes and approaches to consent/assent in pediatrics.

RESULTS. Of 35 clinicians enrolled, 23 (66%) had heard of the term "assent," and 9 (26%) of 35 were aware of the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement on assent. Twenty five (74%) of 34 thought 1 of the main goals of assent was to educate the child. Only 12 (35%) of 34 included the element of seeking the child's agreement as a goal of assent. In practice, the element of explaining the proposed treatment was "always" included by 26 (74%) of 35. The element of seeking the child's agreement was "always" included by 9 (26%) of 35.

CONCLUSIONS. The clinicians in this study had limited explicit knowledge of the concept of assent for medical treatment and were largely unaware of the recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Their attitudes and practice reflected implicit acceptance of the importance of including children in discussions about their medical care and reluctance to give children decision-making authority. A model of medical decision-making for children that includes education but does not allow children to share decision-making authority may be more applicable to clinical practice than the current American Academy of Pediatrics–supported model of assent.

Key Words: assent • informed consent • decision-making • clinician attitudes

Abbreviations: AAP—American Academy of Pediatrics

Accepted Mar 2, 2006.