PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 2 August 2006, pp. 577-585 (doi:10.1542/peds.2006-0162)
ARTICLE |
Increased Rates of Morbidity, Mortality, and Charges for Hospitalized Children With Public or No Health Insurance as Compared With Children With Private Insurance in Colorado and the United States
a Departments of Pediatrics
b Preventive Medicine/Biometrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
c Children's Outcomes Research Center, Denver, Colorado
d Department of Epidemiology and Community Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado
BACKGROUND. There has been a gradual decrease in the proportion of children covered by private health insurance in Colorado and the United States with a commensurate increase in those with public insurance or having no insurance which may impact access to care and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this work was to determine whether children with public or no health insurance have differences in hospital admission rates, morbidity, mortality, and/or charges that might be improved if standards of primary care comparable to those of children with private insurance could be achieved.
METHODS. We conducted a retrospective comparison of hospitalization-related outcomes for children <18 years of age in Colorado from 19952003 and in the United States in 2000. Population-based rates for hospital admission were determined stratified by age, race/ethnicity, disease grouping, and health insurance status.
RESULTS. Compared with those with private insurance, children in Colorado and the United States with public or no insurance have significantly higher rates of total hospital admission, as well as admission for chronic illness, asthma, diabetes, vaccine-preventable disease, psychiatric disease, and ruptured appendix. These children have higher mortality rates, higher severity of illness, are more likely to be admitted through the emergency department and have significantly higher hospital charges per insured child. Higher hospitalization rates occur in children who are nonwhite and/or Hispanic and those who are younger. If children with public or no health insurance in the United States in 2000 had the same hospitalization outcomes as children with private insurance, $5.3 billion in hospital charges could have been saved.
CONCLUSIONS. There is an opportunity to achieve improved health outcomes and decreased hospitalization costs for children with public or no health insurance if private insurance standards of health care could be achieved for all US children.
Key Words: morbidity/mortality cost-effectiveness outcomes analysis health services hospitalization
Abbreviations: SCHIPState Children's Health Insurance Program CHAColorado Hospital Association APR-DRGall-patient refined diagnosis-related group MDCmajor diagnostic category KIDKids' Inpatient Database UFFSunassigned fee-for-service CIconfidence interval ICD-9International Classification of DiseasesNinth Revision
Accepted Mar 2, 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Lister, T. C. Murdock-Vlautin, and A. L. Friedman Report of Colloquium I: The Future of Pediatric Health Care Delivery and Education--Pondering Imponderables to Create an Ideal Residency in a World of Critical Uncertainties Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_1): S12 - S16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Racial Disparities in Diabetes Mortality Among Persons Aged 1-19 Years--United States, 1979-2004 JAMA, March 12, 2008; 299(10): 1129 - 1130. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Berman Universal Coverage For Children: Alternatives, Key Issues, And Political Opportunities Health Aff., March 1, 2007; 26(2): 394 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







