Published online July 3, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 1 July 2006, pp. 91-100 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2343)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geva, R.
Right arrow Articles by Harel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geva, R.
Right arrow Articles by Harel, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Neuropsychological Outcome of Children With Intrauterine Growth Restriction: A 9-Year Prospective Study

Ronny Geva, PhDa, Rina Eshel, PhDb, Yael Leitner, MDb, Aviva Fattal Valevski, MDb and Shaul Harelb

a Institute for Child Neurology and Neurology Unit, Dana Children’s Hospital, Souraski Medical Center, University of Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
b Psychology Department, Developmental Neuropsychological Laboratory, Gonda (Goldschmied) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

OBJECTIVE. The aim was to evaluate the effect of late-onset intrauterine growth restriction on the neuropsychological profile and on academic achievements at 9 years of age using a large-scale prospective paradigm.

STUDY DESIGN. We followed up 123 infants diagnosed with late-onset intrauterine growth restriction yearly for 9 years. They were matched with 63 children for gestation age and multiple socioeconomic factors and evaluated by an extensive neuropsychological battery to assess intelligence quotient, academic achievements, learning and memory, visuomotor skills, visuospatial integration, attention, language, executive functions, and creativity.

RESULTS. Children with intrauterine growth restriction had lower intelligence quotient and more frequent neuropsychological difficulties. Difficulties in executive functioning, inflexibility-creativity, and language, indicative of frontal lobe dysfunction, were typically affected by intrauterine growth restriction and were rarely identified in the control group. Learning difficulties accompanied by lower academic achievements were more prevalent in the intrauterine growth restriction group, particularly when anthropometric catch-up was incomplete.

CONCLUSIONS. The longitudinal findings reaffirm that functional coherence depends on preestablished structural growth and reorganization of the central nervous system. The neuropsychological profile at 9 years of age indicates that late-onset intrauterine growth restriction compromises frontal network functioning.


Key Words: outcomes of high-risk infants • neurocognitive • long-term follow up • executive function/dysfunction • intrauterine growth retardation

Abbreviations: BSP—brain-sparing process • CI—cephalization index • IUGR—intrauterine growth restriction • BW—birth weight • CNS—central nervous system • IQ—intelligence quotient • EGA—estimated gestational age • WISC-R95—Wechsler tests of intelligence-revised • ROCF—Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure • NEPSY—Neuropsycholological Evaluation for Children • HC—head circumference • ANOVA—analysis of variance • NS—not significant • CUG—catch-up growth • AGA—appropriate-for-gestation age


Accepted Jan 19, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
O. S. von Ehrenstein, R. T. Mikolajczyk, and J. Zhang
Timing and Trajectories of Fetal Growth Related to Cognitive Development in Childhood
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2009; 170(11): 1388 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. Figueras, D. Oros, R. Cruz-Martinez, N. Padilla, E. Hernandez-Andrade, F. Botet, C. Costas-Moragas, and E. Gratacos
Neurobehavior in Term, Small-for-Gestational Age Infants With Normal Placental Function
Pediatrics, November 1, 2009; 124(5): e934 - e941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
A. Fattal-Valevski, H. Toledano-Alhadef, Y. Leitner, R. Geva, R. Eshel, and S. Harel
Growth Patterns in Children With Intrauterine Growth Retardation and Their Correlation to Neurocognitive Development
J Child Neurol, July 1, 2009; 24(7): 846 - 851.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
R. S. Procianoy, M. S. Koch, and R. C. Silveira
Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Appropriate and Small for Gestational Age Very Low Birth Weight Infants
J Child Neurol, July 1, 2009; 24(7): 788 - 794.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Feldman and A. I. Eidelman
Triplets Across the First 5 Years: The Discordant Infant at Birth Remains at Developmental Risk
Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 316 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. Dubois, M. Benders, C. Borradori-Tolsa, A. Cachia, F. Lazeyras, R. Ha-Vinh Leuchter, S. V. Sizonenko, S. K. Warfield, J. F. Mangin, and P. S. Huppi
Primary cortical folding in the human newborn: an early marker of later functional development
Brain, August 1, 2008; 131(8): 2028 - 2041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
D-M Walker and N Marlow
Neurocognitive outcome following fetal growth restriction
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2008; 93(4): F322 - F325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
K. Heinonen, K. Raikkonen, A.-K. Pesonen, E. Kajantie, S. Andersson, J. G. Eriksson, A. Niemela, T. Vartia, J. Peltola, and A. Lano
Prenatal and Postnatal Growth and Cognitive Abilities at 56 Months of Age: A Longitudinal Study of Infants Born at Term
Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): e1325 - e1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]