Published online July 3, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 1 July 2006, pp. 114-123 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-3029)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Guttmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Emergency Medicine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Development of Measures of the Quality of Emergency Department Care for Children Using a Structured Panel Process

Astrid Guttmann, MDCM, MSca,b,c, Asma Razzaq, MPHa, Patty Lindsay, BScN, PhDa,c, Brandon Zagorski, MSca and Geoffrey M. Anderson, MD, PhDa,c

a Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
b Divisions of Pediatric and Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
c Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND. Performance measures are essential components of public reporting and quality improvement. To date, few such measures exist to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of emergency department services for children.

OBJECTIVES. Our goal was to use a systematic process to develop measures of emergency department care for children (0–19 years) that are (1) based on research evidence and expert opinion, (2) representative of a range of conditions treated in most emergency departments, (3) related to links between processes and outcomes, and (4) feasible to measure.

METHODS. We presented a panel of providers and managers data from emergency department use to identify common conditions across levels of patient acuity, which could be targets for quality improvement. We used a structured panel process informed by a literature review to (1) identify condition-specific links between processes of care and defined outcomes and (2) select indicators to assess these process-outcome links. We determined the feasibility of calculating these indicators using an administrative data set of emergency department visits for Ontario, Canada.

RESULTS. The panel identified 18 clinical conditions for indicator development and 61 condition-specific links between processes of care and outcomes. After 2 rounds of ratings, the panel defined 68 specific clinical indicators for the following conditions: adolescent mental health problems, ankle injury, asthma, bronchiolitis, croup, diabetes, fever, gastroenteritis, minor head injury, neonatal jaundice, seizures, and urinary tract infections. Visits for these conditions account for 23% of all pediatric emergency department use. Using an administrative data set, we were able to calculate 19 indicators, covering 9 conditions, representing 20% of all emergency department visits by children.

CONCLUSIONS. Using a structured panel process, data on emergency department use, and literature review, it was possible to define indicators of emergency department care for children. The feasibility of these indicators will depend on the availability of high-quality data.

Key Words: emergency department • performance measures • pediatrics • quality

Abbreviations: ED—emergency department • NACRS—National Ambulatory Care Reporting System

Accepted Feb 6, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. F. Knapp, S. D. Simon, and V. Sharma
Quality of Care for Common Pediatric Respiratory Illnesses in United States Emergency Departments: Analysis of 2005 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey Data
Pediatrics, December 1, 2008; 122(6): 1165 - 1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. Guttmann, B. Zagorski, P. C. Austin, M. Schull, A. Razzaq, T. To, and G. Anderson
Effectiveness of Emergency Department Asthma Management Strategies on Return Visits in Children: A Population-Based Study
Pediatrics, December 1, 2007; 120(6): e1402 - e1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
S. E. Krug and M. Gausche-Hill
When There Is "No Room at the Inn": Potential Solution for Overcrowding in a Tertiary Pediatric Center
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2007; 161(9): 911 - 913.
[Full Text] [PDF]