Published online July 3, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 118 No. 1 July 2006, pp. 1-13 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1879)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Colborn, D. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Colborn, D. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tympanometric Findings and the Probability of Middle-Ear Effusion in 3686 Infants and Young Children

Clyde G. Smith, MSa, Jack L. Paradise, MDb,c, Diane L. Sabo, PhDa, Howard E. Rockette, PhDd, Marcia Kurs-Lasky, MSd, Beverly S. Bernard, RN, BSb and D. Kathleen Colborn, BSb

a Departments of Audiology and Communication Disorders
b Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
c Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
d Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

OBJECTIVE. We examined relationships between tympanometric findings and the presence or absence of middle-ear effusion in a population-based sample of children under the age of 3 years.

METHODS. In a study of children’s development in relation to early-life otitis media, we enrolled 6350 infants soon after birth and evaluated them regularly for the presence of middle-ear effusion. In 3686 of the children, we compared tympanometric findings with otoscopic diagnoses. We categorized tympanograms according to varying combinations of tympanometric peak height, peak pressure, and width, and calculated for each resulting category the percentage of the associated ears diagnosed as having effusion. Using these findings we developed algorithms for estimating the probability of middle-ear effusion associated with tympanograms of any configuration.

RESULTS. For tympanograms generally, the lower their height and the greater their width, the greater was the probability of associated middle-ear effusion; the probability also was greater when peak pressure was negative rather than positive. Among children ≥6 months of age, effusion was diagnosed in only 2.7% of ears with tympanometric height ≥0.6 mL, but in 80.2% of ears with flat tympanograms. Relationships among younger infants were similar but less consistent. In both age groups, the tympanographic configurations most commonly encountered were associated with either a relatively low probability (<30%) or a relatively high probability (>70%) of the presence of middle-ear effusion.

The receiver operating characteristic curve we generated using the algorithm we developed for children ≥6 months of age gave an area under the curve of 0.84. The algorithm performed equally well when applied to a separate group of children, suggesting that it is generalizable to other unselected populations.

CONCLUSIONS. The present report offers two alternative methods for estimating the probability of middle-ear effusion in children aged 6 through 35 months, given any combination of tympanometric values.

Key Words: tympanometry • middle-ear effusion • otitis media • otoscopic diagnosis • aural acoustic immittance testing • tympanometric-otoscopic relationships • receiver operating characteristic curve

Abbreviations: MEE—middle-ear effusion • ASHA—American Speech-Language-Hearing Association • ROC—receiver operating characteristic • CI—confidence interval

Accepted Feb 13, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
J. Jacques, H. Moret, D. Minette, N. Leveque, N. Jovenin, G. Deslee, F. Lebargy, J. Motte, and L. Andreoletti
Epidemiological, Molecular, and Clinical Features of Enterovirus Respiratory Infections in French Children between 1999 and 2005
J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2008; 46(1): 206 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. Chianese, A. Hoberman, J. L. Paradise, D. K. Colborn, D. Kearney, H. E. Rockette, and M. Kurs-Lasky
Spectral Gradient Acoustic Reflectometry Compared With Tympanometry in Diagnosing Middle Ear Effusion in Children Aged 6 to 24 Months
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2007; 161(9): 884 - 888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]