Published online June 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 6 June 2006, pp. 1922-1929 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1830)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoyt, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoff, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hoyt, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

Practices and Perceptions of Long-term Follow-up Among State Newborn Screening Programs

Timothy Hoff, PhD and Adrienne Hoyt, MPH

Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Rensselaer, New York

OBJECTIVES. The purposes of the study were to describe and to analyze the types of policies and practices that exist currently among state newborn screening programs in relation to long-term follow-up oversight and activities for newborns with confirmed disorders and to examine the perceptions of newborn screening program leaders regarding long-term follow-up activities.

METHODS. A 23-question survey was administered to state newborn screening program coordinators in each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands in January to February 2005.

RESULTS. Survey findings revealed significant variation in terms of how long-term follow-up is defined, staffed, and conducted within state newborn screening programs. This variation does not seem to be related to existing state program capacity, in terms of size of newborn screening programs or available resources. In addition, at present many state programs do not conduct long-term follow-up oversight or activities for newborns with diagnosed disorders, and many of those that do seem to lack necessary staffing and quality assurance mechanisms for effective long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS. The results point generally to a need for greater attention in aligning state newborn screening program capacity with long-term follow-up, increased emphasis on standardization for long-term follow-up activities, and development of stronger quality assurance oversight from state newborn screening programs if effective long-term follow-up oversight is to occur nationally. Given the present expansion of newborn screening in many states, additional research and policymaking with respect to long-term follow-up seem warranted.

Key Words: follow-up • newborn screening • public health • health policy • newborn screening programs

Abbreviations: LTFU—long-term follow-up • MS/MS—tandem mass spectrometry • NNSGRC—National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center • FTE—full-time employee

Accepted Nov 30, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
T. Hoff, M. Ayoob, and B. L. Therrell
Long-term Follow-up Data Collection and Use in State Newborn Screening Programs
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2007; 161(10): 994 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. A. Tarini
The Current Revolution in Newborn Screening: New Technology, Old Controversies
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2007; 161(8): 767 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]