Published online June 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 6 June 2006, pp. 1907-1914 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2017)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stebbing, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stebbing, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bates, D. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics & Toxicology

Pediatric Medication Safety and the Media: What Does the Public See?

Claire Stebbing, MBBS, MRCPCHa, Rainu Kaushal, MD, MPHa,b and David W. Bates, MD, MSca,c

a Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
b Department of Public Health, Cornell Medical School, New York, New York
c Division of General Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

BACKGROUND. In the safety community, it is widely thought that a culture of safety is required to achieve high levels of safety. However, the press tends to report accidents, which are negative by their nature. Pediatric cases are often especially tragic. Relatively few data have been available on the role that the media play in forming opinions about patient safety and the subsequent impact on the culture of safety.

METHODS. To address these issues, we analyzed newspaper coverage of pediatric medication errors and adverse drug events. We searched Lexis Nexis for newspaper articles on pediatric medication safety from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and Ireland, during a 10-year period (1994–2004), by using specific keywords. Main outcome measures were the number of articles (adjusted for population), the type of events covered, and article slant. We also examined qualitatively the overall themes and the extent to which these articles portrayed a culture of safety to the public.

RESULTS. Throughout the world, there was a steady increase in articles on pediatric medication safety, peaking in 2003, with the highest per-capita rate in Canada. Approximately 65% of articles were about patient incidents, 20% mentioned policy, and 25% discussed research. Of the reported events judged to be negative for patient safety, 75% were covered in a neutral manner and 19% were covered in an unduly negative manner.

CONCLUSIONS. Media coverage of pediatric medication safety has increased in the past 10 years. Reporting of patient safety failures was generally fair, and reports were generally framed in light of a culture of safety.

Key Words: safety • media • public opinion

Accepted Nov 7, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
M. J. Smith, S. S. Ellenberg, L. M. Bell, and D. M. Rubin
Media Coverage of the Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine and Autism Controversy and Its Relationship to MMR Immunization Rates in the United States
Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): e836 - e843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
G. Suresh
If it's in the paper, it must be true: newspaper reporting of pediatric medication errors.
Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): 2281 - 2282.
[Full Text] [PDF]