Published online May 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 5 May 2006, pp. e887-e893 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1064)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uus, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uus, K.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dentistry & Otolaryngology

Effectiveness of Population-Based Newborn Hearing Screening in England: Ages of Interventions and Profile of Cases

Kai Uus, MD, PhD and John Bamford, PhD

Audiology and Deafness Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness in routine practice of the first phase of a national population-based newborn hearing screening and follow-up program that seeks to identify infants with bilateral permanent hearing loss of ≥40-dB hearing loss.

METHODS. The study was a part of the independent evaluation of the 23 first phase sites (annual birth population ~120000) of the national newborn hearing screening program in England. For each infant identified with the defined hearing loss, the measures of interest were degree and type of hearing loss, presence of risk factors, age of first audiologic assessment, age of identification of hearing loss, age of enrollment in an early support program, and age of hearing aid fitting. Data collection took place over the first 2 years of the program.

RESULTS. Data were provided on 169 infants with permanent bilateral moderate or greater hearing loss identified through screening 169487 infants. Fifty-four percent of all cases were from an "at-risk" population. Three fourths of these "at-risk" infants spent ≥48 hours in the NICU. For the whole sample, the median age at first audiologic assessment was 5 weeks; the median age of identification of the hearing loss and of enrollment in early support program was 10 weeks irrespective of the degree of hearing loss; and the median age at hearing aid fitting was 16 weeks. Infants with moderate hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids significantly later than those with severe and profound hearing loss.

CONCLUSIONS. Properly implemented, a newborn hearing screening program based on whole populations and routine service provision can deliver satisfactory outcomes in terms of age of referral, identification, and intervention. The distribution of degree and type of hearing loss and proportion with risk factors was similar to that expected. The numbers identified were such as to suggest that very few cases were missed by the screening program.

Key Words: newborn hearing screening • risk factors • age at identification • age at hearing aid fitting

Abbreviations: NHSP—newborn hearing screening program • CI—confidence interval • OAE—otoacoustic emission • ABR—auditory brainstem response • WIN—well-infant nursery • IQR—interquartile range

Accepted Nov 10, 2005.