PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 5 May 2006, pp. e887-e893 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1064)
Effectiveness of Population-Based Newborn Hearing Screening in England: Ages of Interventions and Profile of Cases
Audiology and Deafness Research Group, School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness in routine practice of the first phase of a national population-based newborn hearing screening and follow-up program that seeks to identify infants with bilateral permanent hearing loss of 
40-dB hearing loss.
METHODS. The study was a part of the independent evaluation of the 23 first phase sites (annual birth population 
120000) of the national newborn hearing screening program in England. For each infant identified with the defined hearing loss, the measures of interest were degree and type of hearing loss, presence of risk factors, age of first audiologic assessment, age of identification of hearing loss, age of enrollment in an early support program, and age of hearing aid fitting. Data collection took place over the first 2 years of the program.
RESULTS. Data were provided on 169 infants with permanent bilateral moderate or greater hearing loss identified through screening 169487 infants. Fifty-four percent of all cases were from an "at-risk" population. Three fourths of these "at-risk" infants spent 48 hours in the NICU. For the whole sample, the median age at first audiologic assessment was 5 weeks; the median age of identification of the hearing loss and of enrollment in early support program was 10 weeks irrespective of the degree of hearing loss; and the median age at hearing aid fitting was 16 weeks. Infants with moderate hearing loss were fitted with hearing aids significantly later than those with severe and profound hearing loss.
CONCLUSIONS. Properly implemented, a newborn hearing screening program based on whole populations and routine service provision can deliver satisfactory outcomes in terms of age of referral, identification, and intervention. The distribution of degree and type of hearing loss and proportion with risk factors was similar to that expected. The numbers identified were such as to suggest that very few cases were missed by the screening program.
Key Words: newborn hearing screening • risk factors • age at identification • age at hearing aid fitting
Abbreviations: NHSP—newborn hearing screening program • CI—confidence interval • OAE—otoacoustic emission • ABR—auditory brainstem response • WIN—well-infant nursery • IQR—interquartile range
Accepted Nov 10, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. P. Moeller, B. Hoover, B. Peterson, and P. Stelmachowicz Consistency of Hearing Aid Use in Infants With Early-Identified Hearing Loss Am J Audiol, June 1, 2009; 18(1): 14 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Spivak, H. Sokol, C. Auerbach, and S. Gershkovich Newborn Hearing Screening Follow-Up: Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Fitting by 6 Months of Age Am J Audiol, June 1, 2009; 18(1): 24 - 33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D C McCann, S Worsfold, C M Law, M Mullee, S Petrou, J Stevenson, H M Yuen, and C R Kennedy Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2009; 94(4): 293 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. W Chang, T J O-Lee, and M. Price Evaluation of unilateral referrals on neonatal hearing screening J Med Screen, March 1, 2009; 16(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
