Published online May 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 5 May 2006, pp. 1511-1518 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2046)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drendel, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gorelick, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Drendel, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gorelick, M. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

Pain Assessment for Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Department

Amy L. Drendel, DO, MS, David C. Brousseau, MD, MS and Marc H. Gorelick, MD, MSCE

Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

OBJECTIVE. To examine the relationship between pediatric patient visit characteristics and pain score documentation in the emergency department (ED) and determine whether documentation of a pain score is associated with increased analgesic use.

METHODS. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of ED visits for pediatric patients from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (1997–2000). Survey weighted regression first was used to assess the association between patient visit characteristics and pain score documentation. The regression then was repeated to determine the association between documentation of a pain score and analgesic use, adjusting for visit characteristics.

RESULTS. A total of 24707 visits were included. Only 44.5% of visits had documented pain scores. In the regression analysis, younger age, self-pay, visits to pediatric facilities, and visits that were not designated as injury related were associated with decreased pain score documentation. Documentation of pain score was associated with increased odds of an analgesic prescription and opioid prescription. When no pain score was documented, the odds of receiving any analgesic was similar to visits with pain documented as mild.

CONCLUSION. ED pain score documentation is suboptimal in the pediatric population. Infants and toddlers are at particular risk for not having a pain score documented. There is a significant association between pain score documentation and the use of any analgesic, particularly opioids. Improvements in pain documentation for acutely ill and injured children are needed to improve pain management.

Key Words: analgesia • pain assessment • emergency department

Abbreviations: ED—emergency department • JCAHO—Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations • NHAMCS—National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey • NCHS—National Center for Health Statistics • OR—odds ratio • CI—confidence interval

Accepted Oct 18, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. MacLaren and Z. N. Kain
Research to Practice in Pediatric Pain: What Are We Missing?
Pediatrics, August 1, 2008; 122(2): 443 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Transcult NursHome page
D. Jongudomkarn, N. Angsupakorn, and P. Siripul
The Development and Validation of the Khon Kaen University Pediatric Pain Assessment Tool for School-Aged Isaan Children in Thailand
J Transcult Nurs, July 1, 2008; 19(3): 213 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Pediatric Oncology NursingHome page
L. K. B. (Zahr), H. Puzantian, M. Abboud, A. Abdallah, and R. Shahine
Assessing Procedural Pain in Children With Cancer in Beirut, Lebanon
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, November 1, 2006; 23(6): 311 - 320.
[Abstract] [PDF]