Published online March 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 3 March 2006, pp. e413-e422 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1385)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pershad, J. Articles by Gilmore, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pershad, J. Articles by Gilmore, B. Related Collections Radiology Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Successful Implementation of a Radiology Sedation Service Staffed Exclusively by Pediatric Emergency Physicians

Jay Pershad, MD and Barry Gilmore, MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Services, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Le Bonheur Children's Medical Center, Memphis, Tennessee; Department of Anesthesia, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee

OBJECTIVE. As the number of diagnostic imaging studies performed has increased, the demand for sedation in support of these radiologic tests has also increased. Our objectives were to (1) assess the safety and efficacy of a radiology sedation service that is staffed exclusively by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians, (2) determine the frequency and the type of commonly performed pediatric imaging studies that require procedural sedation, and (3) assess the average duration of procedural sedation for commonly performed radiologic studies.

METHODS. We conducted a retrospective observational study of patient encounters in 2004 involving procedural sedation to facilitate diagnostic imaging. We are a university-affiliated group of PEM physicians that provide a radiology sedation service during weekdays at a freestanding urban children's hospital.

RESULTS. The sedation service participated in 1285 patient encounters during the study period. Deep sedation was provided to 1027 patients. Moderate sedation was administered to 258 patients. Procedural sedation times for the most frequently performed imaging studies ranged from 5 to 183 minutes. Agents that were used to provide deep sedation were pentobarbital (with midazolam, fentanyl, or both) in 65% of cases, propofol in 31%, and ketamine (with or without midazolam) in 4%. Moderate sedation was achieved with chloral hydrate in 86% and oral diazepam in 14% of the cases. A total of 99.1% of the imaging studies were completed successfully. Six imaging studies were aborted because of failed sedation or occurrence of adverse event. Five patients who were deemed high risk on their presedation evaluation were referred electively for general anesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS. Our data suggest that a dedicated sedation team in support of diagnostic imaging services, staffed exclusively by PEM physicians, can be a successful clinical enterprise. The service consumes significant resources and physician time.

---

Key Words: emergency physicians • radiology • sedation

Abbreviations: PEM—pediatric emergency medicine • RSS—radiology sedation service • ASA—American Society of Anesthesiologists

---

Accepted Aug 30, 2005.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Wetzel Don't Confuse the Anesthetic with the Anesthesiologist! Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2006; 103(4): 859 - 862. [Full Text] [PDF]