Published online March 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 3 March 2006, pp. e363-e373 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2005-1009)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neurology & Psychiatry
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Involved Upper-Extremity Use in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Is Not Age-Dependent

Andrew M. Gordon, PhDa,b, Jeanne Charles, PhD, MSW, PTa and Steven L. Wolf, PhD, PT, FAPTAc

a Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College
b Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York
c Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

OBJECTIVES. Constraint-induced (CI) movement therapy has been shown recently to be promising for improving upper-limb function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Because little is known about patient characteristics predicting treatment efficacy, not all children may benefit from this intervention. Here we examine the relationship between efficacy of a child-friendly form of CI therapy and age on involved upper-extremity function.

DESIGN. Twenty children with hemiplegic CP age 4 to 13 years received CI therapy and completed evaluations. Based on established functional and neuromaturational changes in hand skill development, the children were divided into a "younger group" (age 4–8 years, n = 12) and "older group" (age 9–13 years, n = 8). Children wore a sling on their noninvolved upper extremity for 6 hours per day for 10 of 12 consecutive days, during which time they were engaged in play and functional activities. Each child was evaluated by trained evaluators who were blinded to the fact that the children received treatment. The evaluations took place once before the intervention and at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after the intervention. Efficacy was examined at the movement efficiency (Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function, subtest 8 of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency), environmental (caregiver frequency and quality of involved upper-limb use), and impairment (strength, tactile sensitivity, and muscle tone) levels.

RESULTS. Children in both age groups had significant improvements in involved hand-movement efficiency and environmental functional limitations, which were retained through the 6-month posttest. However, there were no differences in efficacy between younger and older children. Both hand severity and the children's behavior during testing (number of redirections), with the latter serving as a reasonable correlate for attention during the intervention, were related to changes in performance in the younger group but not in the older group.

CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that the intensive practice associated with CI therapy can improve movement efficiency and environmental functional limitations among a carefully selected subgroup of children with hemiplegic CP of varying ages and that this efficacy is not age-dependent.


Key Words: constraint-induced therapy • cerebral palsy • children • hand and arm movement • rehabilitation • hemiplegia • forced use

Abbreviations: CP—cerebral palsy • CI—constraint-induced • CFUS—Caregiver Functional Use Survey


Accepted Sep 13, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Salimi, K. M. Friel, and J. H. Martin
Pyramidal Tract Stimulation Restores Normal Corticospinal Tract Connections and Visuomotor Skill after Early Postnatal Motor Cortex Activity Blockade
J. Neurosci., July 16, 2008; 28(29): 7426 - 7434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
S. L Wolf
Revisiting Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: Are We Too Smitten With the Mitten? Is All Nonuse "Learned"? and Other Quandaries
Physical Therapy, September 1, 2007; 87(9): 1212 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]