Published online March 1, 2006
PEDIATRICS Vol. 117 No. 3 March 2006, pp. 796-802 (doi:10.1542/peds.2005-1403)

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Violato, C. Articles by Fidler, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Violato, C. Articles by Fidler, H. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Assessment of Pediatricians by a Regulatory Authority

Claudio Violato, PhD^a, Jocelyn M. Lockyer, PhD^a,b and Herta Fidler, MSc^b

^a Department of Community Health Sciences
^b Office of Continuing Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

OBJECTIVE. To determine whether it is possible to develop feasible, valid, and reliable multisource feedback data for pediatricians.

METHODS. Surveys with 40, 22, 38, and 37 items were developed for assessment of pediatricians by patients, co-workers, medical colleagues, and themselves, respectively, using 5-point scales with an "unable to assess" category. Items addressed key competencies related to communication skills, professionalism, collegiality, continuing professional development, and collaboration. Each pediatrician was assessed by 25 patients, 8 medical colleagues, and 8 co-workers. Feasibility was assessed with response rates for each instrument. Validity was assessed with rating profiles, the percentage of participants unable to assess the physician for each item, and exploratory factor analyses to determine which items grouped together into scales. Cronbach's and generalizability coefficient analyses assessed reliability.

RESULTS. One hundred pediatricians participated. The mean number of respondents per physician was 23.4 (93.6%) for patients, 7.6 (94.8%) for co-workers, and 7.6 (95.5%) for medical colleagues. The mean ratings ranged from 4 to 5 for each item on each scale. Few items had high percentages of "unable to assess" responses. The factor analyses revealed a 4-factor solution for the patient survey, a 3-factor solution for the co-worker survey, and a 4-factor solution for the medical colleague survey, accounting for at least 64% of the variance. All instruments had high internal consistency. The generalizability coefficients were .85 for patients, .87 for co-workers, and .78 for medical colleagues.

CONCLUSION. Surveys can be developed to provide feedback data on key competencies.

---

Key Words: pediatricians • assessment

Abbreviations: PAR—Physician Achievement Review • CIS—Customer Information Services • MSF—multisource feedback • CPSA—College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta • Ep²—generalizability coefficient

---

Accepted Jul 29, 2005.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J L Campbell, S H Richards, A Dickens, M Greco, A Narayanan, and S Brearley Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 187 - 193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Lockyer, C. Violato, and H. M. Fidler Assessment of Radiology Physicians by a Regulatory Authority Radiology, June 1, 2008; 247(3): 771 - 778. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]