Advertising Disclaimer
Published online December 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 6 December 2005, pp. 1466-1473 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1699)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patel, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kimura, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Accuracy of Methods for Calculating Postnatal Growth Velocity for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants

Aloka L. Patel, MD*, Janet L. Engstrom, RN, CNM, PhD{ddagger}, Paula P. Meier, RN, DNSc{ddagger}, Robert E. Kimura, MD*

* Departments of Pediatrics
{ddagger} Women’s and Children’s Health Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Objective. No uniform method for calculating growth velocity (GV) (grams per kilogram per day) among extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants has been reported. Because the calculation of actual GV is so labor intensive, investigators have estimated GV with varying approaches, making comparisons across studies difficult. This study compares the accuracy of 3 mathematical methods used for estimating average GV, namely, 2-point models using the difference between weights at 2 time points divided by time and weight (either birth weight [BW] or average weight), linear regression models that are normalized for either BW or average weight, and an exponential model. The accuracy of all models was compared with actual GVs calculated from daily weight measures for a group of ELBW infants.

Methods. Actual GVs were calculated from daily weights for 83 ELBW infants admitted to the special care nursery and were compared with estimated GVs from each of the 5 models for the same infants.

Results. The exponential model, using weights from 2 time points, ie, GV = [1000 x ln(Wn/W1)]/(Dn – D1), was extremely accurate, with mean absolute errors of 0.02% to 0.10%. The 2-point and linear models were highly inaccurate when BW was used in the denominator, with mean absolute errors of 50.3% to 96.4%. The 2-point and linear models were fairly accurate when average weight was used in the denominator, with mean absolute errors of 0.1% to 8.97%. Additional analyses showed that the accuracy of the 2-point and linear model estimates was affected significantly by the combination of BW, length of stay, and chronic lung disease, whereas the exponential model was not affected by these combined factors.

Conclusions. GV estimates calculated with 3 commonly used models varied widely, compared with actual GVs; however, the exponential model estimates were extremely accurate. The exponential model provides the accuracy and ease of use that are lacking in current methods applied to infant growth research.

Key Words: infant • extremely low birth weight • growth velocity • mathematical model • prematurity

Abbreviations: BW, birth weight • ELBW, extremely low birth weight • GV, growth velocity • LOS, length of stay • ANCOVA, analysis of covariance

Accepted Mar 24, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
C. R. Martin, Y. F. Brown, R. A. Ehrenkranz, T. M. O'Shea, E. N. Allred, M. B. Belfort, M. C. McCormick, A. Leviton, and and the Extremely Low Gestational Age Newborns Stu
Nutritional Practices and Growth Velocity in the First Month of Life in Extremely Premature Infants
Pediatrics, August 1, 2009; 124(2): 649 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]