PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 5 November 2005, pp. e716-e723 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2631)
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE |
Do Pacifiers Reduce the Risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? A Meta-analysis
* Departments of Family Medicine
Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC
Objective. Pacifier use has been reported to be associated with a reduced risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), but most countries around the world, including the United States, have been reluctant to recommend the use of pacifiers because of concerns about possible adverse effects. This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify and evaluate the protective effect of pacifiers against SIDS and to make a recommendation on the use of pacifiers to prevent SIDS.
Methods. We searched the Medline database (January 1966 to May 2004) to collect data on pacifier use and its association with SIDS, morbidity, or other adverse effects. The search strategy included published articles in English with the Medical Subject Headings terms "sudden infant death syndrome" and "pacifier" and the keywords "dummy" and "soother." Combining searches resulted in 384 abstracts, which were all read and evaluated for inclusion. For the meta-analysis, articles with data on the relationship between pacifier use and SIDS risk were limited to published original case-control studies, because no prospective observational reports were found; 9 articles met these criteria. Two independent reviewers evaluated each study on the basis of the 6 criteria developed by the American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Infant Positioning and SIDS; in cases of disagreement, a third reviewer evaluated the study, and a consensus opinion was reached. We developed a script to calculate the summary odds ratio (SOR) by using the reported ORs and respective confidence intervals (CI) to weight the ORs. We then pooled them together to compute the SOR. We performed the Breslow-Day test for homogeneity of ORs, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for the null hypothesis of no effect (OR = 1), and the Mantel-Haenszel common OR estimate. The consistency of findings was evaluated and the overall potential benefits of pacifier use were weighed against the potential risks. Our recommendation is based on the taxonomy of the 5-point (A–E) scale adopted by the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Results. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The SOR calculated for usual pacifier use (with univariate ORs) is 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79–1.03) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59–0.85) with multivariate ORs. For pacifier use during last sleep, the SORs calculated using univariate and multivariate ORs are 0.47 (95% CI: 0.40–0.55) and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.31–0.50), respectively.
Conclusions. Published case-control studies demonstrate a significant reduced risk of SIDS with pacifier use, particularly when placed for sleep. Encouraging pacifier use is likely to be beneficial on a population-wide basis: 1 SIDS death could be prevented for every 2733 (95% CI: 2416–3334) infants who use a pacifier when placed for sleep (number needed to treat), based on the US SIDS rate and the last-sleep multivariate SOR resulting from this analysis. Therefore, we recommend that pacifiers be offered to infants as a potential method to reduce the risk of SIDS. The pacifier should be offered to the infant when being placed for all sleep episodes, including daytime naps and nighttime sleeps. This is a US Preventive Services Task Force level B strength of recommendation based on the consistency of findings and the likelihood that the beneficial effects will outweigh any potential negative effects. In consideration of potential adverse effects, we recommend pacifier use for infants up to 1 year of age, which includes the peak ages for SIDS risk and the period in which the infant's need for sucking is highest. For breastfed infants, pacifiers should be introduced after breastfeeding has been well established.
Key Words: pacifiers • SIDS • risk factors • risk reduction • meta-analytic methods
Abbreviations: SIDS, sudden infant death syndrome • AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • OR, odds ratio • CI, confidence interval • SOR, summary odds ratio • USPSTF, US Preventive Services Task Force
Accepted May 25, 2005.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. R. O'Connor, K. O. Tanabe, M. S. Siadaty, and F. R. Hauck Pacifiers and Breastfeeding: A Systematic Review Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2009; 163(4): 378 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P S Blair, E A Mitchell, E M A Heckstall-Smith, and P J Fleming Head covering - a major modifiable risk factor for sudden infant death syndrome: a systematic review Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2008; 93(9): 778 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. H. Schwartz and K. L. Guthrie Infant Pacifiers: An Overview Clinical Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 47(4): 327 - 331. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Eisenhut, G. Haycock, and A. Greenough Sudden infant death, bed-sharing and dummies: authors' reply. Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 560 - 560. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Y. Moon and L. Y. Fu Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Pediatr. Rev., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 209 - 214. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E A Mitchell Recommendations for sudden infant death syndrome prevention: a discussion document Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 155 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Journal Watch Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 274 - 275. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Heinig and J. Banuelos American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) Statement on SIDS Reduction: Friend or Foe of Breastfeeding? J Hum Lact, February 1, 2006; 22(1): 7 - 10. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Do Pacifiers Prevent SIDS? Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, November 28, 2005; 2005(1128): 4 - 4. [Full Text]
|
|
