Published online November 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 5 November 2005, pp. 1114-1121 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1627)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stukel, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Stukel, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn

Regional Variation in Rates of Low Birth Weight

Lindsay A. Thompson, MD, MS*,{ddagger}, David C. Goodman, MD, MS*,{ddagger}, Chiang-Hua Chang, MS{ddagger} and Thérèse A. Stukel, PhD{ddagger},§

* Department of Pediatrics
{ddagger} Center for the Evaluative Clinical Sciences and Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
§ Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, and Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Objective. Low birth weight (LBW; <2500 g) is the result of complex and poorly understood interactions between the biological determinants of the mother and the fetus, the parent’s socioeconomic status, and medical care. After controlling for these established risk factors, the extent of regional variation in LBW rates remains unknown. This study measures regional variation in LBW rates and identifies regions of neonatal health services with significantly high or low adjusted rates.

Methods. Linking the United States 1998 singleton birth cohort (N = 3.8 million) with county and health care characteristics, we conducted a small area analysis of LBW across 246 regions of neonatal health services. We measured observed rates and then used a multivariable, hierarchical model to estimate adjusted LBW rates by regions. We then stratified these rates by race for the 208 regions with adequate sample size.

Results. Observed LBW rates varied across regions from 3.8 to 10.6 per 100 live births (interquartile range: 5.0–6.8 [25th–75th percentile]; median: 5.9). After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, 67 (27.0%) regions had rates significantly below and 98 (39.8%) regions had rates significantly higher than the national rate of 6.0 per 100 live births. Although black mothers were more likely to give birth to an LBW newborn, regional adjusted rates still varied >3-fold within both black and nonblack subgroups.

Conclusions. After controlling for known maternal and area risk factors, LBW rates markedly varied across US regions of neonatal health services for both black and nonblack mothers. Additional analyses of these regions may provide opportunities for regional accountability in pregnancy outcomes, LBW research, and targeted improvement interventions, especially in high-risk populations.

Key Words: infant low birth weight • small area analysis • health services research

Abbreviations: LBW, low birth weight • NICR, Neonatal Intensive Care Region • NSA, Neonatal Intensive Care Region

Accepted Feb 4, 2005.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Fradin, S. Heath, J. Lepercq, M. Lathrop, and P. Bougneres
Identification of Distinct Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Length or Weight Variability at Birth in Humans
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 4164 - 4170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]