Published online July 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 1 July 2005, pp. e58-e65 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1603)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grunau, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Grunau, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Aerobic Capacity, Strength, Flexibility, and Activity Level in Unimpaired Extremely Low Birth Weight (≤800 g) Survivors at 17 Years of Age Compared With Term-Born Control Subjects

Marilyn Rogers, BSR, PT/OT*, Taryn B. Fay, MS{ddagger}, Michael F. Whitfield, MD*,§, Jill Tomlinson, CCHRA(C)* and Ruth E. Grunau, PhD*,{ddagger},§

* Neonatal Follow-Up Programme, Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
§ Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
{ddagger} Centre for Community Child Health Research, BC Research Institute for Children's and Women's Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Objectives. To compare aerobic capacity, strength, flexibility, and activity level in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) adolescents at 17 years of age with term-born control subjects.

Methods. Fifty-three ELBW teens of birth weight ≤800 g were assessed at 17.3 years (16.3–19.7 years; birth weight: 720 g [520–800 g]; gestation: 26 weeks [23–29 weeks]) along with term-born control subjects (n = 31) at age 17.8 years (16.5–19.0 years; birth weight: 3506 g [3068–4196 g]; gestation: weeks 40 [39–42 weeks]). ELBW and control teens were assessed by a pediatric physiotherapist and completed components of the Canadian Physical Activity, Fitness and Lifestyle Appraisal and a self-assessment fitness and activity questionnaire. Continuous data were analyzed using MANOVA (group, gender) followed by t tests; categorical data were analyzed using the {chi}2 test.

Results. ELBW teens had lower aerobic capacity, grip strength, leg power, and vertical jump; could do fewer push-ups; had less abdominal strength as measured by curl-ups; had less lower back flexibility; and had tighter hamstrings. ELBW teens reported less previous and current sports participation, lower physical activity level, and poorer coordination compared with term-born control subjects. ELBW teens were also found to have more difficulty with maintenance of rhythm and cadence. Although ELBW teens rated themselves lower on all measures of sporting activity, they were as happy with their level of fitness as the control subjects.

Conclusions. Compared with term-born control subjects, there are significant differences in motor performance in unimpaired ELBW survivors in late adolescence, reflected in aerobic capacity, strength, endurance, flexibility, and activity level. We conclude that these differences in fitness and physical activity are related to the interaction of effects of premature birth on the motor system together with a more inactive lifestyle. These findings have potential implications for later adult health problems.


Key Words: premature infants • extremely low birth weight infants • follow-up studies • motor development • strength • flexibility

Abbreviations: ELBW, extremely low birth weight • DCD, developmental coordination disorder • VLBW, very low birth weight • mCAFT, Modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test • CPAFLA, Canadian Physical Activity Fitness and Lifestyle Appraisal test


Accepted Nov 22, 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
A. A. Sayer, E. M. Dennison, H. E. Syddall, K. Jameson, H. J. Martin, and C. Cooper
The Developmental Origins of Sarcopenia: Using Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography to Assess Muscle Size in Older People
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2008; 63(8): 835 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
I. Holm, P. M. Fredriksen, M. A. Fosdahl, M. Olstad, and N. Vollestad
Impaired Motor Competence in School-aged Children With Complex Congenital Heart Disease
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2007; 161(10): 945 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]