PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 1 July 2005, pp. e21-e25 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2452)
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE |
Standard Drug Concentrations and Smart-Pump Technology Reduce Continuous-Medication-Infusion Errors in Pediatric Patients

* Primary Childrens Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Objective. To determine if combining standard drug concentrations with "smart-pump" technology reduces reported medication-infusion errors.
Design. Preintervention and postintervention comparison of reported medication errors related to infusion therapies during the calendar years 2002 and 2003.
Setting. A 242-bed university-affiliated tertiary pediatric hospital.
Intervention. Change in continuous-medication-infusion process, comprising the adoption of (1) standard drug concentrations, (2) "smart" syringe pumps, and (3) human-engineered medication labels.
Main Outcome Measures. Comparison of reported continuous-medication-infusion errors before and after the intervention.
Results. The number of reported errors dropped by 73% for an absolute risk reduction of 3.1 to 0.8 per 1000 doses. Preparation errors that occurred in the pharmacy decreased from 0.66 to 0.16 per 1000 doses; the number of 10-fold errors in dosage decreased from 0.41 to 0.08 per 1000 doses.
Conclusions. The use of standard drug concentrations, smart syringe pumps, and user-friendly labels reduces reported errors associated with continuous medication infusions. Standard drug concentrations can be chosen to allow most neonates to receive needed medications without concerns related to excess fluid administration.
Key Words: rule of six intensive care unit children patient safety medication errors
Accepted Jan 6, 2005.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Duckers, M. Faber, J. Cruijsberg, R. Grol, L. Schoonhoven, and M. Wensing Safety and Risk Management Interventions in Hospitals: A Systematic Review of the Literature Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2009; 66(6_suppl): 90S - 119S. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Snijders, R A van Lingen, H Klip, W P F Fetter, T W van der Schaaf, H A Molendijk, and on behalf of the NEOSAFE study group Specialty-based, voluntary incident reporting in neonatal intensive care: description of 4846 incident reports Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2009; 94(3): F210 - F215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Shane Current status of administration of medicines Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2009; 66(5_Supplement_3): s42 - s48. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Morriss Jr Adverse Medical Events in the NICU: Epidemiology and Prevention NeoReviews, January 1, 2008; 9(1): e8 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Snijders, R A van Lingen, A Molendijk, and W P F Fetter Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2007; 92(5): F391 - F398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Bratton Unexpected Increase in Mortality Associated with Implementation of a Computerized Order Entry System AAP Grand Rounds, March 1, 2006; 15(3): 32 - 33. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Bratton Medication Errors Reduced with Smart-Pump Infusion AAP Grand Rounds, December 1, 2005; 14(6): 68 - 69. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||









