Advertising Disclaimer
Published online July 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 1 July 2005, pp. 82-87 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2573)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bundy, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Margolis, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bundy, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Margolis, P. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Open Access in Primary Care: Results of a North Carolina Pilot Project

David G. Bundy, MD, MPH*,{ddagger}, Greg D. Randolph, MD, MPH*,§, Mark Murray, MD, MPA||, John Anderson, MD, Peter A. Margolis, MD, PhD*,§

* Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics
{ddagger} Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program
§ Center for Children's Healthcare Improvement, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
|| Mark Murray and Associates, Sacramento, California
Duke University Affiliated Physicians, Durham, North Carolina

OBJECTIVE.: Appointment delays impede access to primary health care. By reducing appointment delays, open access (OA) scheduling may improve access to and the quality of primary health care. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the potential impact of OA on practice and patient outcomes by using pilot-study data from 4 North Carolina primary care practices.

METHODS.: We conducted an interrupted time-series pilot study of 4 North Carolina primary care practices (2 family medicine and 2 pediatric practices) participating in a quality-improvement (QI) collaborative from May 2001 to May 2002. The year-long collaborative comprised 25 practices and consisted of three 2-day meetings led by expert faculty, monthly data feedback, and monthly conference calls. Our main outcome measures were appointment delays, appointment no-shows, patient satisfaction, continuity of care, and staff satisfaction during the 12-month study period.

RESULTS.: Providers in all 4 practices successfully implemented OA. On average, providers reduced their delay to the third available preventive care appointment from 36 to 4 days. No-show rates declined (first quarter [Q1] rate: 16%; fourth quarter [Q4] rate: 11%; no-show reduction: 5% [95% confidence interval: 1%, 10%]), and overall patient satisfaction improved (Q1: 45% rated overall visit quality as excellent; Q4: 61% rated overall visit quality as excellent; change in satisfaction: 16% [95% confidence interval: 0.2%, 30%]). Continuity of care followed a similar pattern of improvement, but the change was not statistically significant. Staff satisfaction neither improved nor declined.

CONCLUSIONS.: This pilot study suggests that primary care practices can implement OA successfully by using QI-collaborative methods. These results provide preliminary evidence that OA may improve practice and patient outcomes in primary care. These analyses should be repeated in larger groups of practices with longer follow-up.

Key Words: health services accessibility • appointments and schedules • quality of care

Abbreviations: OA, open access • PCP, primary care physician • QI, quality improvement • Qn, quarter n • CI, confidence interval

Accepted Feb 28, 2005.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Mehrotra, L. Keehl-Markowitz, and J. Z. Ayanian
Implementing Open-Access Scheduling of Visits in Primary Care Practices: A Cautionary Tale
Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2008; 148(12): 915 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
T. Coker, L. P. Casalino, G. C. Alexander, and J. Lantos
Should Our Well-Child Care System Be Redesigned? A National Survey of Pediatricians
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1852 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
M. E. O'Connor, B. S. Matthews, and D. Gao
Effect of open access scheduling on missed appointments, immunizations, and continuity of care for infant well-child care visits.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2006; 160(9): 889 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]