Published online July 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 1 July 2005, pp. 8-14 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2004-1324)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korinthenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mönting, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korinthenberg, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mönting, J. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intravenously Administered Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Childhood Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Randomized Trial

Rudolf Korinthenberg, MD*, Joachim Schessl, MD*, Janbernd Kirschner, MD* and Jürgen Schulte Mönting, PhD{ddagger}

* Division of Neuropediatrics and Muscular Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
{ddagger} Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany

Objective. To determine the optimal treatment for childhood Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS).

Methods. We performed a randomized, multicenter study of GBS according to international diagnostic criteria. In study 1 (early treatment), children able to walk unaided for 5 meters were randomized for 1 g/kg intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG) over 2 days or no treatment. The primary outcome measure was the degree of disability at nadir. In study 2 (treatment for severe GBS), children unable to walk 5 meters unaided were randomized for 1 g/kg IVIG over 2 days or 0.4 g/kg IVIG over 5 days. The primary outcome measure was the number of days needed to regain the ability to walk unaided. Children randomized for no treatment in study 1 could enter study 2 if loss of unaided walking occurred.

Results. Ninety-five children with GBS were registered in 40 months. Twenty-one children were randomized in study 1 and 51 in study 2 (5 after deterioration in study 1). Twenty-eight children were not randomized for various reasons. Eleven of 21 patients in study 1 lost the ability to walk unassisted and 6 were bedridden, with no statistically significant difference between the children initially randomized for treatment versus no treatment. Recovery occurred faster in the group randomized for early treatment. In study 2, recovery did not differ significantly between the children treated for 2 days versus 5 days (median time to unaided walking: 19 days vs 13 days). Secondary transient deterioration in the disability score occurred more frequently in the group with the 2-day regimen than in the group treated for 5 days (5 of 23 patients vs 0 of 23 patients). Multivariate analysis with Cox regression showed that disease severity at the nadir was the only prognostic factor for recovery.

Conclusions. Treatment with IVIG before loss of unaided walking did not give rise to a less severe course, but recovery occurred somewhat faster. However, given the small number of patients, the power of this conclusion is low. For treatment after loss of unaided walking, there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of 2 g/kg IVIG administered over 2 days versus 5 days. Early "relapses" occurred more frequently after the shorter treatment regimen.


Key Words: Guillain-Barré • syndrome • immunoglobulins • childhood • disability

Abbreviations: GBS, Guillain-Barré • syndrome • IVIG, intravenously administered immunoglobulin • PE, plasma exchange • CSF, cerebrospinal fluid • CI, confidence interval • ITT, intention-to-treat


Accepted Nov 8, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological DisordersHome page
H. C. Lehmann, G. Meyer zu Horste, B. C. Kieseier, and H.-P. Hartung
Review: Pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated neuropathies
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, July 1, 2009; 2(4): 261 - 281.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. A. C. Hughes, A. V. Swan, J.-C. Raphael, D. Annane, R. van Koningsveld, and P. A. van Doorn
Immunotherapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: a systematic review
Brain, September 1, 2007; 130(9): 2245 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J Schessl, M Koga, K Funakoshi, J Kirschner, W Muellges, A Weishaupt, R Gold, and R Korinthenberg
Prospective study on anti-ganglioside antibodies in childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome
Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 2007; 92(1): 48 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
F. J. DiMario Jr
Intravenous Immunoglobulin in the Treatment of Childhood Guillain-Barre Syndrome: A Randomized Trial
Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): 226 - 228.
[Full Text] [PDF]