Advertising Disclaimer
Published online July 1, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 116 No. 1 July 2005, pp. 104-111 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1340)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Seyda, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Seyda, B. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Comparison of Mothers' and Counselors' Perceptions of Predelivery Counseling for Extremely Premature Infants

Heather T. Keenan, MDCM, PhD*, Mia W. Doron, MD, MTS*,{ddagger}, Beth A. Seyda, BS§

* Departments of Social Medicine
{ddagger} Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
§ Compassionate Passages, Inc, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Objective. To understand mothers' and counselors' perceptions of their roles in decision-making about resuscitation of extremely premature infants at delivery and to assess mothers' and counselors' satisfaction with the counseling and decision-making process.

Methods. Mothers who delivered an infant between 22 and 27 completed weeks of gestation and their self-identified counselor were interviewed using a structured interview format. Mothers' and counselors' perceptions of the content, tone, and directiveness of predelivery counseling and their satisfaction with the decision-making process were compared. Demographic data were collected for the mothers, infants, and counselors. Simple descriptive statistics described demographic characteristics of mothers, counselors, and infants. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to determine agreement within individual mother-counselor pairs about the content and directiveness of counseling.

Results. Thirty-three counselors and 15 mother-counselor pairs were interviewed. The majority (66.7%) of mothers stated that the counselor had made a treatment recommendation, and 60% stated that they had no choice in how their infant would be treated. Only 27.3% of counselors stated that they had made a recommendation, saying instead that they had described the treatment plan or offered options. Counselors believed that mothers were given a treatment choice in 57.6% of encounters. Specific mother-counselor pairs showed little correlation in their perceptions of whether a treatment recommendation had been made (R = 0.0) or a choice had been given about resuscitation (R = 0.07). Despite a lack of perceived choice, mothers generally believed that they were included in treatment decisions (66.7%) and were satisfied with the amount of influence that they had in the decision-making process (73.3%).

Conclusions. The decision-making process in this study conforms most closely to a model of informed assent. Mothers may have been satisfied with this type of counseling because they felt informed and included in the decision-making process. Physicians and nurses need to elicit mothers' preferences to incorporate them into the treatment plan, as counseling about the resuscitation of extremely premature infants at delivery is considered directive by mothers even when it is not intended to be directive.

Key Words: counseling • decision-making • ethics • extremely preterm infants • resuscitation

Accepted Oct 21, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. G. Batton and Committee on Fetus and Newborn
Antenatal Counseling Regarding Resuscitation at an Extremely Low Gestational Age
Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): 422 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
R. D. Boss, N. Hutton, L. J. Sulpar, A. M. West, and P. K. Donohue
Values Parents Apply to Decision-Making Regarding Delivery Room Resuscitation for High-Risk Newborns
Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 122(3): 583 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]