Advertising Disclaimer
Published online May 2, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 115 No. 5 May 2005, pp. 1378-1391 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0575)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boluyt, N.
Right arrow Articles by Offringa, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boluyt, N.
Right arrow Articles by Offringa, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

SPECIAL ARTICLE

Quality of Evidence-Based Pediatric Guidelines

Nicole Boluyt, MD*, Carsten R. Lincke, MD, PhD{ddagger}, Martin Offringa, MD, PhD*

* Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
{ddagger} Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Objective. To identify evidence-based pediatric guidelines and to assess their quality.

Methods. We searched Medline, Embase, and relevant Web sites of guideline development programs and national pediatric societies to identify evidence-based pediatric guidelines. A list with titles of identified guidelines was sent to 51 leading pediatricians in the Netherlands, who were asked to select the 5 most urgent topics for guideline development. Three pediatrician reviewers appraised the available guidelines on the 10 most frequently mentioned topics with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument.

Results. A total of 215 evidence-based pediatric guidelines were identified; of these, 17 guidelines on the 10 most frequently mentioned topics were appraised. The AGREE instrument rates guidelines among 6 domains. For the scope and purpose domain, the mean score was 84% of the maximal mark. For stakeholder involvement, the mean score was 42%, with 12 guidelines (71%) scoring <50%. For rigor of development, the mean score was 54%, with 5 guidelines (29%) scoring <50%. For clarity and presentation, the mean score was 78%, with 4 guidelines (24%) scoring <50%. For applicability and editorial independence, performance was poor, with mean scores of 19% and 40%, respectively. Low scores were partly attributable to poor reporting. After considering all domain scores, the reviewers recommended 14 of 17 guidelines (82%) to be used in local practice.

Conclusions. The current volume of pediatric guidelines categorized as evidence based in popular databases is large. Overall, these guidelines scored well, compared with other studies on guideline quality in fields outside pediatrics, when assessed for quality with the AGREE instrument. This holds especially for guidelines published or endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics or registered in the National Guideline Clearinghouse.


Key Words: practice guidelines • evidence-based medicine • quality of health care • pediatric

Abbreviations: AGREE, Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation • AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • SIGN, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines • CMA, Canadian Medical Association • NGC, National Guideline Clearinghouse • ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient


Accepted Sep 23, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. A. Spooner and D. C. Classen
Data Standards and Improvement of Quality and Safety in Child Health Care
Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(Supplement_2): S74 - S79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
F E Babl, N Sheriff, M Borland, J Acworth, J Neutze, D Krieser, P Ngo, J Schutz, F Thomson, E Cotterell, et al.
Paediatric acute asthma management in Australia and New Zealand: practice patterns in the context of clinical practice guidelines
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 307 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Watine, B. Friedberg, E. Nagy, R. Onody, W. Oosterhuis, P. S. Bunting, J.-C. Charet, and A. R. Horvath
Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]