Published online May 2, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 115 No. 5 May 2005, pp. 1283-1288 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2004-1297)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anand, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by Bauchner, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Parents

Shikha G. Anand, MD*, Mitchell J. Feldman, MD{ddagger}, David S. Geller, MD{ddagger}, Alice Bisbee, MPH§ and Howard Bauchner, MD*

* Division of General Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine
{ddagger} Harvard Medical School
§ Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Background. E-mail exchange between parents of patients and providers has been cited by the Institute of Medicine as an important aspect of contemporary medicine; however, we are unaware of any data describing actual exchanges.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the content of e-mails between providers and parents of patients in pediatric primary care, as well as parent attitudes about e-mail.

Design/Methods. Over a 6-week period, all e-mail exchanges between 2 primary care pediatricians and their patients’ parents were evaluated and coded. An exchange was defined as the e-mails between parent and primary care provider about a single inquiry. Parents also completed a questionnaire regarding this service.

Results. Of 55 parents, 54 (98%) agreed to have their e-mails with their pediatrician reviewed. The 54 parents generated 81 e-mail exchanges; 86% required only 1 e-mail response from the pediatrician, and the other 14% required an average of 1.9 responses. E-mail inquiries were all for nonacute issues (as judged by S.G.A.) and included inquiries about a medical question (n = 43), medical update (n = 20), subspecialty evaluation (n = 9), and administrative issue (n = 9). The 81 exchanges resulted in 9 appointments, 21 phone calls, 4 subspecialty referrals, 34 prescriptions or recommendations for over-the-counter medications, 11 administrative tasks, and 1 radiograph. Of 91 pediatrician-generated e-mails, 39% were sent during the workday (9 AM to 5 PM, Monday to Friday), 44% were sent on weeknights, and 17% were sent on weekends. During the study period, the 2 physicians estimated an average of 30 minutes/day spent responding to e-mail. Of the 54 parents, 45 (83%) returned the survey; 93% were mothers and 86% had completed college. Ninety-eight percent were very satisfied with their e-mail experience with their pediatrician. Although 80% felt that all pediatricians should use e-mail to communicate with parents and 65% stated they would be more likely to choose a pediatrician based on access by e-mail, 63% were unwilling to pay for access.

Conclusions. This is the first study to describe actual e-mail exchange between parents and their providers. Exchanges seem to be different from those generated by the telephone, with more e-mails related to medical versus administrative issues and more resulting in office visits. Approximately 1 in 4 exchanges result in multiple e-mails back and forth between parent and provider. Parents who have actually exchanged e-mails with their providers overwhelmingly endorse it, although they are reluctant to pay for it.


Key Words: e-mail • computers • primary care

Abbreviations: IOM, Institute of Medicine


Accepted Sep 7, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Thompson and E Carr
Content analysis of general practitioner-requested lumbar spine X-ray reports
Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 866 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. Rosen and C. K. Kwoh
Patient-Physician E-mail: An Opportunity to Transform Pediatric Health Care Delivery
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): 701 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
J. R. Thomas and U. Shaikh
Electronic Communication With Patients for Breastfeeding Support
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2007; 23(3): 275 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. H. Stone
Communication between Physicians and Patients in the Era of E-Medicine
N. Engl. J. Med., June 14, 2007; 356(24): 2451 - 2454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AAP Grand RoundsHome page
T. Kind
E-mail and Parent/Physician Communication
AAP Grand Rounds, September 1, 2005; 14(3): 34 - 34.
[Full Text] [PDF]