Published online May 2, 2005
PEDIATRICS Vol. 115 No. 5 May 2005, pp. 1268-1272 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0834)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fant, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fant, K. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, A. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Completeness and Complexity of Information Available to Parents From Newborn-Screening Programs

Kathryn E. Fant, MPH, Sarah J. Clark, MPH and Alex R. Kemper, MD, MPH, MS

From the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, Division of General Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Background. In 2000, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Task Force on Newborn Screening published a blueprint for the future of newborn screening that included recommendations for information provided to parents about screening.

Objectives. To evaluate the completeness of educational material provided by newborn-screening programs and to measure the reading level and complexity of the material.

Methods. Telephone survey of newborn-screening programs (n = 51) followed by content analysis of educational material.

Results. All 51 programs responded (response rate: 100%); 47 of these programs made educational material available. None of the material included all elements recommended in the blueprint. Benefits of screening (98%) and how parents would be notified of results (87%) were included more often than the risks of screening (19%), possibility of a false-positive result (13%), importance of (34%) and how to respond to (28%) a positive result, and the storage and use of residual samples (11%). The median readability grade level was 10. Grade-level complexity of the material was not associated with completeness according to the AAP criteria.

Conclusions. Parent educational materials for newborn-screening programs do not meet the standard recommended by the AAP, and there are important variations between programs in the information provided to parents. Continuing research is needed to measure progress toward the goals outlined within the blueprint and to assess how these changes impact the care provided through newborn-screening programs.

Key Words: health information • newborn screening • practice guidelines

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics

Accepted Sep 3, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Pediatr PsycholHome page
D. B. Bailey Jr, F. D. Armstrong, A. R. Kemper, D. Skinner, and S. F. Warren
Supporting Family Adaptation to Presymptomatic and "Untreatable" Conditions in an Era of Expanded Newborn Screening
J. Pediatr. Psychol., July 1, 2009; 34(6): 648 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
D. B. Bailey Jr, D. Skinner, A. M. Davis, I. Whitmarsh, and C. Powell
Ethical, Legal, and Social Concerns About Expanded Newborn Screening: Fragile X Syndrome as a Prototype for Emerging Issues
Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 121(3): e693 - e704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Policy Politics Nursing PracticeHome page
H. Bishop Hubbard
Policy Issues Related to Expanded Newborn Screening: A Review of Three Genetic/Metabolic Disorders
Policy Politics Nursing Practice, August 1, 2007; 8(3): 201 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
B. A. Tarini
The Current Revolution in Newborn Screening: New Technology, Old Controversies
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2007; 161(8): 767 - 772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
B. A. Tarini, D. A. Christakis, and H. G. Welch
State Newborn Screening in the Tandem Mass Spectrometry Era: More Tests, More False-Positive Results
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 448 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
S. D. Grosse, C. A. Boyle, A. Kenneson, M. J. Khoury, and B. S. Wilfond
From Public Health Emergency to Public Health Service: The Implications of Evolving Criteria for Newborn Screening Panels
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 923 - 929.
[Full Text] [PDF]