PEDIATRICS Vol. 115 No. 4 April 2005, pp. e500-e503 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2004-1921)
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE |
Homeostasis Model Assessment Is More Reliable Than the Fasting Glucose/Insulin Ratio and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index for Assessing Insulin Resistance Among Obese Children and Adolescents

* Departments of Pediatrics
Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
Objective. Simple fasting methods to measure insulin resistance, such as the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), fasting glucose/insulin ratio (FGIR), and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) methods, have been widely promoted for adult studies but have not been evaluated formally among children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to compare the HOMA, FGIR, and QUICKI methods for measuring insulin resistance, expressed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) results, among obese children and adolescents.
Methods. Fifty-seven pubertal obese children and adolescents (30 girls and 27 boys; mean age, 12.04 ± 2.90 years; mean BMI: 29.57 ± 5.53) participated in the study. All participants underwent an OGTT. Blood samples were obtained 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after oral glucose administration for glucose and insulin measurements, and 2 separate groups were studied, according to the presence or absence of insulin resistance. HOMA, FGIR, and QUICKI methods were studied for validation of insulin resistance determined with the OGTT for these groups.
Results. The groups consisted of 25 obese children and adolescents with insulin resistance (14 girls and 11 boys; mean age: 12.88 ± 2.88 years; mean BMI: 31.29 ± 5.86) and 32 subjects without insulin resistance (16 girls and 16 boys; mean age: 11.38 ± 2.79 years; mean BMI: 28.23 ± 4.94). There were significant differences in the mean HOMA (6.06 ± 4.98 and 3.42 ± 3.14, respectively) and QUICKI (0.313 ± 0.004 and 0.339 ± 0.004, respectively) values between the 2 groups. Sensitivity and specificity calculations based on insulin resistance with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that HOMA had high sensitivity and specificity for measuring insulin resistance.
Conclusions. As a measure of insulin resistance among children and adolescents, HOMA is more reliable than FGIR and QUICKI. The present HOMA cutoff point for diagnosis of insulin resistance is 3.16. The HOMA cutoff point of >2.5 is valid for adults but not for adolescents.
Key Words: insulin resistance children adolescents
Abbreviations: HOMA, homeostasis model assessment OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test FGIR, fasting glucose/insulin ratio QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index ROC, receiver operating characteristic
Accepted Nov 8, 2004.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M G. Shaikh, R. G Grundy, and J. M W Kirk Hyperleptinaemia rather than fasting hyperinsulinaemia is associated with obesity following hypothalamic damage in children Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(6): 791 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Langens, T. Dapper, R. Nuboer, C. van Weel, and J. van Binsbergen Co-morbidity obese children in family practice in The Netherlands: the results of a pilot study Fam. Pract., December 1, 2008; 25(suppl_1): i75 - i78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cacho, J. Sevillano, J. de Castro, E. Herrera, and M. P. Ramos Validation of simple indexes to assess insulin sensitivity during pregnancy in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2008; 295(5): E1269 - E1276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Cummings, S. Henes, K. M. Kolasa, J. Olsson, and D. Collier Insulin Resistance Status: Predicting Weight Response in Overweight Children Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2008; 162(8): 764 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Danielson, M. L. Drum, and R. B. Lipton Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin and Testosterone in Individuals With Childhood Diabetes Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1207 - 1213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Rossner, M. Neovius, S. M. Montgomery, C. Marcus, and S. Norgren Alternative Methods of Insulin Sensitivity Assessment in Obese Children and Adolescents Diabetes Care, April 1, 2008; 31(4): 802 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Sardinha, L. B. Andersen, S. A. Anderssen, A. L. Quiterio, R. Ornelas, K. Froberg, C. J. Riddoch, and U. Ekelund Objectively Measured Time Spent Sedentary Is Associated With Insulin Resistance Independent of Overall and Central Body Fat in 9- to 10-Year-Old Portuguese Children Diabetes Care, March 1, 2008; 31(3): 569 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Le Stunff, A. Dechartres, V. Mariot, C. Lotton, C. Trainor, E. Miraglia Del Giudice, D. Meyre, I. Bieche, I. Laurendeau, P. Froguel, et al. Association Analysis Indicates That a Variant GATA-Binding Site in the PIK3CB Promoter Is a Cis-Acting Expression Quantitative Trait Locus for This Gene and Attenuates Insulin Resistance in Obese Children Diabetes, February 1, 2008; 57(2): 494 - 502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rosso, A. Parodi, G. d'Annunzio, F. Ginocchio, L. Nicolini, C. Torrisi, M. P. Sormani, R. Lorini, C. Viscoli, and M. Vignolo Evaluation of insulin resistance in a cohort of HIV-infected youth Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 157(5): 655 - 659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Asato, K. Katsuren, T. Ohshiro, K. Kikawa, T. Shimabukuro, and T. Ohta Relationship Between Lipid Abnormalities and Insulin Resistance in Japanese School Children Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2006; 26(12): 2781 - 2786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Lee, M. J. Okumura, M. M. Davis, W. H. Herman, and J. G. Gurney Prevalence and Determinants of Insulin Resistance Among U.S. Adolescents: A population-based study. Diabetes Care, November 1, 2006; 29(11): 2427 - 2432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S Johnston, S. L Tjonn, P. D Swan, A. White, H. Hutchins, and B. Sears Ketogenic low-carbohydrate diets have no metabolic advantage over nonketogenic low-carbohydrate diets Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2006; 83(5): 1055 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||












