PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 6 December 2004, pp. 1620-1626 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0447)
End-of-Life After Birth: Death and Dying in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, and the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Chicago, Illinois
Objective. In canonical modern bioethics, withholding and withdrawing medical interventions for dying patients are considered morally equivalent. However, electing not to administer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) struck us as easily distinguishable from withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Moreover, withdrawing mechanical ventilation from a moribund infant "feels" different from withdrawing mechanical ventilation from a hemodynamically stable child with a severe neurologic insult. Most previous descriptions of withdrawing and withholding intervention in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have blurred many of these distinctions. We hypothesized that clarifying them would more accurately portray the process of end-of-life decision-making in the NICU.
Methods. We reviewed the charts of all newborn infants who had birth weight >400 g and died in our hospital in 1988, 1993, and 1998 and extracted potential ethical issues (resuscitation, withdrawal, withholding, CPR, do-not-resuscitate orders, neurologic prognosis, ethics consult) surrounding each infant's death.
Results. Using traditional definitions, roughly half of all deaths in our NICU in 1993 and 1998 were associated with "withholding or withdrawing." In addition, by 1998, >40% of our NICU deaths could be labeled "active withdrawal," reflecting the extubation of infants regardless of their physiologic instability. This practice is growing over time. However, 2 important conclusions arise from our more richly elaborated descriptions of death in the NICU. First, when CPR was withheld, it most commonly occurred in the context of moribund infants who were already receiving ventilation and dopamine. Physiologically stable infants who were removed from mechanical ventilation for quality-of-life reasons accounted for only 3% of NICU deaths in 1988, 16% of NICU deaths in 1993, and 13% of NICU deaths in 1998. Moreover, virtually none of these active withdrawals took place in premature infants. Second, by 1998 infants, who died without CPR almost always had mechanical ventilation withdrawn. Finally, the median and average day of death for 100 nonsurvivors who received full intervention did not differ significantly from the 78 nonsurvivors for whom intervention was withheld.
Conclusions. In our unit, a greater and greater percentage of doomed infants die without ever receiving chest compressions or epinephrine boluses. Rather, we have adopted a nuanced approach to withdrawing/withholding NICU intervention, providing what we hope is a humane approach to end-of-life decisions for doomed NICU infants. We suggest that ethical descriptions that reflect these nuances, distinguishing between withholding and withdrawing interventions from physiologically moribund infants or physiologically stable infants with morbid neurologic prognoses, provide a more accurate reflection of the circumstances of dying in the NICU.
Key Words: bioethics • withdrawing/withholding • NICU
Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation • DR, delivery room • DNR, do not resuscitate
Accepted May 26, 2004.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N Teisseyre, I D. dos Reis, P C Sorum, and E Mullet The acceptability among French lay persons of ending the lives of damaged newborns J. Med. Ethics, November 1, 2009; 35(11): 701 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. E. Verhagen, J. H. H. M. Dorscheidt, B. Engels, J. H. Hubben, and P. J. Sauer End-of-Life Decisions in Dutch Neonatal Intensive Care Units Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2009; 163(10): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Wilkinson Death in the Netherlands: Evidence and Argument Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 2009; 163(10): 958 - 959. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. E. Verhagen, M. de Vos, J. H. H. M. Dorscheidt, B. Engels, J. H. Hubben, and P. J. Sauer Conflicts About End-of-Life Decisions in NICUs in the Netherlands Pediatrics, July 1, 2009; 124(1): e112 - e119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Williams, J. Cairnie, V. Fines, C. Patey, K. Schwarzer, J. Aylward, L. Lohfeld, H. Kirpalani, and for the With Care team Construction of a Parent-Derived Questionnaire to Measure End-of-Life Care After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 123(1): e87 - e95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Sawyer Withdrawing Support for Withdrawing Support From Premature Infants With Severe Intracranial Hemorrhage Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 1071 - 1072. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Meadow, J. Lagatta, B. Andrews, L. Caldarelli, A. Keiser, J. Laporte, S. Plesha-Troyke, M. Subramanian, S. Wong, J. Hron, et al. Just, in Time: Ethical Implications of Serial Predictions of Death and Morbidity for Ventilated Premature Infants Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): 732 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. E. Verhagen, M. A. H. van der Hoeven, R. C. van Meerveld, and P. J. J. Sauer Physician Medical Decision-making at the End of Life in Newborns: Insight Into Implementation at 2 Dutch Centers Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 120(1): e20 - e28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Wilkinson Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die? J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2006; 32(8): 454 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Hentschel, K. Lindner, M. Krueger, and S. Reiter-Theil Restriction of Ongoing Intensive Care in Neonates: A Prospective Study Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 563 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D J Wilkinson, J J Fitzsimons, P A Dargaville, N T Campbell, P M Loughnan, P N McDougall, and J F Mills Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: changing patterns of end of life care over two decades. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2006; 91(4): F268 - F271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A. E. Verhagen and P. J. J. Sauer End-of-Life Decisions in Newborns: An Approach From the Netherlands Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 116(3): 736 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Clark Baby Doe Rules Have Been Interpreted and Applied by an Appellate Court Pediatrics, August 1, 2005; 116(2): 513 - 514. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
