PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 5 November 2004, pp. 1220-1226 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0355)
Children With Unexplained Chronic Pain: Do Pediatricians Agree Regarding the Diagnostic Approach and Presumed Primary Cause?


* Department of General Pediatrics
Rudolf Magnus Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Department of Psychiatry and Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, Netherlands
|| Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
Objective. To investigate the opinions of general pediatricians regarding children with unexplained chronic pain (UCP), with respect to the presumed cause of the pain and the optimal diagnostic approach for these children.
Design. Diagnostic follow-up study.
Setting. Outpatient clinic of a university childrens hospital.
Participants. A total of 134 consecutive patients, 8 to 18 years of age, referred for pain of
3-month duration without a satisfactory explanation at presentation.
Methods. A full copy of the patient records from routine medical practice and data from standardized psychiatric assessments, standardized questionnaires, and standardized follow-up assessments were provided to 17 pediatricians assigned to 3 panels.
Main Outcome Measures. Agreement regarding the presumed primary cause and diagnostic approach for children with UCP, with consensus being defined as
80% agreement among the pediatricians.
Results. The mean age of the children (73% girls) was 11.8 years (SD: 2.6 years). Psychiatric (co)morbidity was present for 60% of the children. Consensus regarding the presumed primary cause was reached for 43% of the patients (58 of 134 patients), ie, 72% (42 of 58 patients) primarily dysfunctional, 17% (10 of 58 patients) primarily psychologic, and 10% (6 of 58 patients) primarily somatic. Consensus regarding the diagnostic approach was reached for 63% of the children (84 of 134 children), leaving more than one-third of the children (37%) without diagnostic consensus.
Conclusions. The relatively high rates of disagreement regarding the optimal diagnostic approach and presumed primary cause illustrate the difficulties of diagnostic evaluation and subsequent therapeutic strategy design for this patient group. Therefore, children with UCP might be at risk for suboptimal care.
Key Words: diagnosis pain expert panel chronic consensus
Abbreviations: UCP, unexplained chronic pain PUC, Pain of Unknown Origin in Children
Accepted May 10, 2004.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Furness, C. Glazebrook, J. Tay, K. Abbas, and K. Slaveska-Hollis Medically Unexplained Physical Symptoms in Children: Exploring Hospital Staff Perceptions Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, October 1, 2009; 14(4): 575 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Konijnenberg, E. R. de Graeff-Meeder, J. van der Hoeven, J. L. L. Kimpen, J. K. Buitelaar, C. S.P.M. Uiterwaal, and and the Pain of Unknown Origin in Children Study G Psychiatric Morbidity in Children With Medically Unexplained Chronic Pain: Diagnosis From the Pediatrician's Perspective Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 889 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






