Published online October 1, 2004
PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 4 October 2004, pp. e497-e505 (doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1036)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shenassa, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shenassa, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Gastrointestinal Tract

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Maternal Smoking and Infantile Gastrointestinal Dysregulation: The Case of Colic

Edmond D. Shenassa, ScD*,{ddagger} and Mary-Jean Brown, ScD, RN§

* Department of Community Health, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island
{ddagger} Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, Brown Medical School and the Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
§ Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Background. Infants' healthy growth and development are predicated, in part, on regular functioning of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In the first 6 months of life, infants typically double their birth weights. During this period of intense growth, the GI tract needs to be highly active and to function optimally. Identifying modifiable causes of GI tract dysregulation is important for understanding the pathophysiologic processes of such dysregulation, for identifying effective and efficient interventions, and for developing early prevention and health promotion strategies. One such modifiable cause seems to be maternal smoking, both during and after pregnancy.

Purpose. This article brings together information that strongly suggests that infants' exposure to tobacco smoke is linked to elevated blood motilin levels, which in turn are linked to an increased risk of GI dysregulation, including colic and acid reflux. We base this hypothesis on evidence supporting a link between maternal smoking and infantile colic (IC) and on additional evidence proposing increased motilin release, attributable to exposure to tobacco smoke and its metabolites, as a physiologic mechanism linking maternal smoking with infantile GI dysregulation.

Methods. We critically review and synthesize epidemiologic, physiologic, and biological evidence pertaining to smoking and colic, smoking and motilin levels, and motilin and colic.

Results. Six studies have investigated the link between maternal smoking and IC, but IC was defined according to Wessel's rule of threes (crying for ≥3 hours per day, ≥3 days per week, for ≥3 weeks) in only 1 of these studies. The remaining studies used definitions that ranged from less-stringent variations of Wessel's criteria to definitions that would suggest excessive crying but not necessarily colic. Results from 5 of these studies suggest that there is an independent association between maternal smoking and excessive crying, as well as IC. Recent studies of the GI system provide strong, but indirect, corroborating evidence suggesting physiologic pathways through which maternal smoking can be linked to IC. This physiologic evidence can be outlined as follows: (1) smoking is linked to increased plasma and intestinal motilin levels and (2) higher-than-average levels of motilin are linked to elevated risks of IC. Although these findings from disparate fields suggest a physiologic mechanism linking maternal smoking with IC, the entire chain of events has not been examined in a single cohort. A prospective study, begun in pregnancy and continuing through the first 4 months of life, could provide definitive evidence linking these disparate lines of research. Key points for such a study are considered.

Conclusions. New epidemiologic evidence suggests that exposure to cigarette smoke and its metabolites may be linked to IC. Moreover, studies of the GI system provide corroborating evidence that suggests that (1) smoking is linked to increased plasma and intestinal motilin levels and (2) higher-than-average intestinal motilin levels are linked to elevated risks of IC. In the United States, nearly one-half of all women smokers continue to smoke during their pregnancies. This amounts to ~12% of all women who give birth. Moreover, it is estimated that 50% to 80% of employed adults have regular exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and that >30% of nonsmokers live with smokers. If, as we suspect, exposure to cigarette smoke increases the risk of colic, then this would provide additional incentives to parents to abstain from smoking. Decreased exposure to tobacco smoke can be expected to provide widespread and long-term health benefits to maternal and child populations.


Key Words: colic • smoking • smoking during pregnancy • motilin • GI dysfunction • maternal and child health

Abbreviations: GI, gastrointestinal • IC, infantile colic • ETS, environmental tobacco smoke • RR, risk ratio • CI, confidence interval • MMC, migrating motor complex


Accepted May 19, 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
C. A. Canivet, P.-O. Ostergren, I. L. Jakobsson, E. Dejin-Karlsson, and B. M. Hagander
Infantile colic, maternal smoking and infant feeding at 5 weeks of age
Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2008; 36(3): 284 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. von Kries, H. Kalies, and M. Papousek
Excessive Crying Beyond 3 Months May Herald Other Features of Multiple Regulatory Problems
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2006; 160(5): 508 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]