Published online September 1, 2004
PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 3 September 2004, pp. e384-e386 (doi:10.1542/10.1542/peds.2004-0130)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muensterer, O. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muensterer, O. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Temporary Removal of Navel Piercing Jewelry for Surgery and Imaging Studies

Oliver J. Muensterer, MD

From the Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dr von Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich, Munich, Germany

Background. Navel piercings are becoming increasingly popular among adolescents. Body piercing jewelry must be removed before surgery, because electrical burns can occur with electrocauterization. Also, piercing jewelry creates artifacts during magnetic resonance imaging. Even temporary piercing jewelry removal may lead to closure of the subcutaneous tract; therefore, temporary replacement with a nonmetallic spacer is indicated.

Objective. This report describes a simple, safe, effective method for perioperative temporary replacement of navel piercing jewelry with a universally available, nonmetallic, sterile, intravenous catheter.

Methods. The umbilical piercing jewelry of 5 adolescent female patients was removed before surgical or radiologic interventions by using the following technique: 1) disinfecting the piercing and umbilical area with 70% isopropyl alcohol, 2) opening the piercing jewelry by removing the bead from the bar, 3) placing the tip of a tight-fitting intravenous catheter (14 or 16 gauge, without the needle) over the threaded tip of the bar, 4) advancing the intravenous catheter caudally, pushing the piercing out of the skin tract, and 5) removing the jewelry and leaving the intravenous catheter in the subcutaneous skin tract as a spacer. After the intervention, the piercing jewelry was reinserted by following the described steps in reverse order. The patients were evaluated after 1 week, for assessment of any adverse effects, including infection.

Results. With this method, piercing jewelry removal and reinsertion required <2 minutes for all patients. No procedural complications were noted. All jewelry was reinserted successfully after the procedure. The intravenous catheter left in situ did not interfere with surgery, and it did not produce any artifacts or adverse effects during magnetic resonance imaging. Follow-up evaluations at 1 week demonstrated no signs of irritation, infection, or other side effects of the procedure for any of the patients.

Conclusions. Periprocedural removal of navel piercing jewelry with this new technique proved to be quick, feasible, and safe. Piercings in other locations on the body may be replaced for surgery or imaging studies in the same way, with minor modifications.

Key Words: piercing • jewelry • removal

Accepted Mar 22, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. G. Shellock and A. Spinazzi
MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1140 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Nothing new....
David A Skipper
Pediatrics Online, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
News for healthcare workers
Oliver J Muensterer, et al.
Pediatrics Online, 20 Dec 2004 [Full text]