Advertising Disclaimer
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agran, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agran, P. F.
Right arrow Articles by Winn, D. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 114 No. 1 July 2004, pp. 109-115

Violators of a Child Passenger Safety Law

Phyllis F. Agran, MD, MPH, Craig L. Anderson, PhD, DHSc, Diane G. Winn, RN, MPH

From the University of California, Center for Health Policy and Research, Child Injury and Traffic Safety Research Group, Irvine, California

Background. Nonuse of child car safety seats (CSSs) remains significant; in 2000, 47% of occupant fatalities among children <5 years of age involved unrestrained children. Nonusers and part-time users of CSSs represent small proportions of the US population that have not responded to intervention efforts. Our study examined the factors contributing to nonuse or part-time use of CSSs and the effects of exposure to a class for violators of the California Child Passenger Safety (CPS) law.

Methods. Focus groups (in English and Spanish) were conducted with individuals cited for violation of the law (N = 24). A thematic analysis of notes made by an observer, supplemented by audiotapes of the sessions, was conducted. In addition, a study of the effects of exposure to a violator class on knowledge and correct CSS use was conducted among violators. Certified CPS technicians conducted the classes and interviews. Subjects were parents cited as the driver with a child of 20 to 40 pounds, between 12 and 47 months of age. One hundred subjects recruited from the class were compared with 50 subjects who did not attend a class. Follow-up home interviews, with inspection of CCS use, were conducted 3 months after payment of the fine and completion of all court requirements. Fisher’s exact test was used for 2 x 2 tables, because some of the tables had small cell sizes. The Mann-Whitney rank sum test was used for child restraint use, knowledge, and correct use scales, because some of these variables were not normally distributed. Linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the effects of several variables on these parameters.

Results. Factors influencing CSS nonuse were 1) lifestyle factors, 2) transportation and trip circumstances, 3) nonparent or nondriver issues, 4) parenting style, 5) child’s behavior, and 6) perceived risks of nonuse. Violator subjects were mostly Hispanic and female, with incomes of less than $30 000 per year. Those exposed to the class (citation and education group) scored 1 point higher on a knowledge test and had 1 more item correct on a CSS use instrument than did the group not exposed to the class (citation only group). In the logistic model, the citation and education group scored higher on the 2 items that were corrected by the instructor during the class.

Conclusion. Our focus group study of CPS law violators revealed that multiple complex factors influence consistent use of a CSS. The interplay of the particular vehicle, the trip circumstances, and family/parent/child factors affected the use of a CSS at the time of parent citation. Addressing transportation issues and parenting skills in CPS programs is necessary. Among parents who had been ticketed for not restraining their children, exposure to a violator class demonstrated some benefit, compared with a fine alone. Correct CSS use improved most on items corrected by the instructor. Violator classes that include "hands-on" training show promise for improving rates of correct use of CSSs.


Key Words: child injury • child passenger safety • car seat law • violators of child passenger safety law

Abbreviations: CSS, car safety seat • CPS, child passenger safety


Received for publication Jun 30, 2003; Accepted Jan 6, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
A. Lennon
A risky treat: exploring parental perceptions of the barriers to seating their children in the rear seats of passenger vehicles
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2007; 13(2): 105 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
V. L. Gunn, R. M. Phillippi, and W. O. Cooper
Improvement in Booster Seat Use in Tennessee
Pediatrics, January 1, 2007; 119(1): e131 - e136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. F. Agran, C. Anderson, and D. G. Winn
Development of a Child Safety Seat Hassles Scale in a Largely Low-Income Latino Population
Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e85 - e91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Inj. Prev.Home page
M Martin, J Holden, Z Chen, and K Quinlan
Child passenger safety for inner-city Latinos: new approaches from the community.
Inj. Prev., April 1, 2006; 12(2): 99 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
E Javouhey, A-C Guerin, B Gadegbeku, M Chiron, and D Floret
Are restrained children under 15 years of age in cars as effectively protected as adults?
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2006; 91(4): 304 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]