This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dani, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rubaltelli, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dani, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rubaltelli, F. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Premature & Newborn
PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 6 June 2004, pp. e560-e563

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Early Extubation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Surfactant Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants <30 Weeks’ Gestation

Carlo Dani, MD, Giovanna Bertini, MD, Marco Pezzati, MD, Alessandra Cecchi, MD, Cosimo Caviglioli, MD and Firmino F. Rubaltelli, MD

From the Department of Surgical and Medical Critical Care, Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy

Objective. To test the hypothesis that preterm infants with infant respiratory distress syndrome who are treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and surfactant administration followed by immediate extubation and NCPAP application (SURF-NCPAP group) demonstrate less need for mechanical ventilation (MV), compared with infants who receive MV after surfactant administration (SURF-MV group).

Methods. A prospective randomized study was conducted, in which infants <30 weeks’ gestation were randomized to the SURF-NCPAP group or the SURF-MV group.

Results. At 7 days of life, no patient in the SURF-NCPAP group but 6 patients (43%) in the SURF-MV group still were undergoing MV. The duration of oxygen therapy, NCPAP, and MV, the need for a second dose of surfactant, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit were significantly greater in the SURF-MV group.

Conclusions. The immediate reinstitution of NCPAP after surfactant administration for infants with infant respiratory distress syndrome is safe and beneficial, as indicated by the lesser need for MV and the briefer requirement for respiratory supports, compared with the institution of MV after surfactant treatment. Moreover, this strategy contributed to reducing the need for surfactant treatment and reducing the time and costs involved in keeping the infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Key Words: continuous positive airway pressure • mechanical ventilation • surfactant • respiratory distress syndrome • infant

Abbreviations: a/APO2, arterial/alveolar oxygen tension ratio • iRDS, infant respiratory distress syndrome • MV, mechanical ventilation • NCPAP, nasal continuous positive airway pressure • SURF-MV, mechanical ventilation after surfactant treatment • SURF-NCPAP, nasal continuous positive airway pressure after surfactant treatment • FIO2, fraction of inspired oxygen • IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage • BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia • ROP, retinopathy of prematurity • PDA, patent ductus arteriosus

Received for publication Nov 10, 2003; Accepted Jan 28, 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NEJMHome page
E. C. Eichenwald and A. R. Stark
Management and Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight
N. Engl. J. Med., April 17, 2008; 358(16): 1700 - 1711.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
I. Frerichs, P. A. Dargaville, H. van Genderingen, D. R. Morel, and P. C. Rimensberger
Lung Volume Recruitment after Surfactant Administration Modifies Spatial Distribution of Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2006; 174(7): 772 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]