This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Halfon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Halfon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Olson, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 6 June 2004, pp. 1926-1933


SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE

Assessing Development in the Pediatric Office

Neal Halfon, MD, MPH*,{ddagger}, Michael Regalado, MD§, Harvinder Sareen, MPH{ddagger}, Moira Inkelas, PhD{ddagger}, Colleen H. Peck Reuland, MS||, Frances P. Glascoe, PhD, EdS and Lynn M. Olson, PhD#

* UCLA Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, California
{ddagger} UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities, Los Angeles, California
§ Developmental Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
|| The Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative and Kaiser NW Center for Health Research
Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, and Penn State University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
# Department of Practice and Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois

Objective. To determine the proportion of children aged 10 to 35 months who were reported ever to have received a developmental assessment (DA) and to examine characteristics of the child, family, and health care setting associated with the receipt of a DA.

Methods. The National Survey of Early Childhood Health, conducted in 2000, is a survey of 2068 parents of children 4 to 35 months of age. Children were classified as having received a DA in response to 2 questions: whether the child’s pediatric provider ever told parents that he or she was doing a "developmental assessment" and/or parents recalled explicit components of a DA, such as stacking blocks or throwing a ball. Parent-reported receipt of a DA was assessed in relationship to child and family, health care access, other measures of health care content and process, and measures of quality and satisfaction.

Results. Approximately 57% of children 10 to 35 months of age ever received a DA. Forty-two percent of parents recalled ever being told by their child’s pediatric provider that a DA was being done. Thirty-nine percent recalled their child’s being asked to perform specific tasks routinely included in a DA. Bivariate analysis indicates that receipt of a DA is not associated with child or family sociodemographic characteristics such as maternal education and household income, with the exception of race/ethnicity. Less acculturated Hispanic parents reported a DA more frequently than parents in other racial/ethnic groups (66% vs 56%). A smaller proportion of parents whose children who used community health centers reported their child’s ever having received a DA compared with children who use other settings (51% vs 60%). Compared with other children, parents whose child ever received a DA reported more frequently than other parents that the time spent with the child’s provider during the last well-child visit was adequate (94% vs 80%). They also reported longer visits (19 minutes vs 16 minutes), higher family-centered care ratings (mean: 71 vs 59), and higher satisfaction with well-child care (8.9 vs 8.4). Receipt of a DA is also associated with the content of developmentally focused anticipatory guidance received. For each health supervision topic analyzed, frequency of discussion is higher for children who ever received a DA. In multivariate analysis, odds of receiving a DA are higher for children with longer visits with the provider (odds ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.05) and lower for children in community health clinics compared with a private office (odds ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.39–0.96), even accounting for total well-child visits to the pediatric provider.

Conclusion. Although guidelines endorse the routine provision of DAs, parents of many children do not report receiving DAs. Children who receive assessments are more likely to receive other developmental services, and their parents are more likely to report greater satisfaction with care and rate the interpersonal quality of well-child care more favorably. The substantial number of children who do not receive these routinely recommended services raises important questions about the quality of care received.


Key Words: developmental assessment • anticipatory guidance • quality of care • children

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • DA, developmental assessment • NSECH, National Survey of Early Childhood Health • PEDS, Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status • FCC, family-centered care • OR, odds ratio • CI, confidence interval • HEDIS, Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set


Received for publication Oct 20, 2003; Accepted Jan 13, 2004.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. Rose-Jacobs, M. M. Black, P. H. Casey, J. T. Cook, D. B. Cutts, M. Chilton, T. Heeren, S. M. Levenson, A. F. Meyers, and D. A. Frank
Household Food Insecurity: Associations With At-Risk Infant and Toddler Development
Pediatrics, January 1, 2008; 121(1): 65 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
R. G. Voigt, A. M. Llorente, C. L. Jensen, J. K. Fraley, W. J. Barbaresi, and W. C. Heird
Comparison of the Validity of Direct Pediatric Developmental Evaluation Versus Developmental Screening by Parent Report
Clinical Pediatrics, July 1, 2007; 46(6): 523 - 529.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. Coker, L. P. Casalino, G. C. Alexander, and J. Lantos
Should Our Well-Child Care System Be Redesigned? A National Survey of Pediatricians
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 1852 - 1857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
E. M. McDonald, B. S. Solomon, W. C. Shields, J. R. Serwint, M.-C. Wang, and A. C. Gielen
Do Urban Parents' Interests in Safety Topics Match Their Children's Injury Risks?
Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2006; 7(4): 388 - 395.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
M. F. Earls and S. S. Hay
Setting the Stage for Success: Implementation of Developmental and Behavioral Screening and Surveillance in Primary Care Practice--The North Carolina Assuring Better Child Health and Development (ABCD) Project
Pediatrics, July 1, 2006; 118(1): e183 - e188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
L. T. Blanchard, M. J. Gurka, and J. A. Blackman
Emotional, developmental, and behavioral health of American children and their families: a report from the 2003 National Survey of Children's Health.
Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): e1202 - e1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
D. Ehrmann Feldman, M. Couture, L. Grilli, M.-N. Simard, L. Azoulay, and J. Gosselin
When and by Whom Is Concern First Expressed for Children With Neuromotor Problems?
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2005; 159(9): 882 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch PediatricsHome page
What Parents Think of Well Child Healthcare in the U.S.
Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, July 12, 2004; 2004(712): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]