This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Winston, F. K. Articles by Durbin, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Winston, F. K. Articles by Durbin, D. R. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 5 May 2004, pp. e458-e464

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Recent Trends in Child Restraint Practices in the United States

Flaura K. Winston, MD, PhD^*, Irene G. Chen, MPH, DrPH^*, Michael R. Elliott, PhD, Kristy B. Arbogast, PhD^* and Dennis R. Durbin, MD, MSCE^*,

^* Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Objective. To assess the success of recent outreach activities to promote appropriate child restraint in motor vehicles by examining trends in restraint types used by children under age 9 in 3 large regions of the United States.

Methods. Cross-sectional study was conducted of children who were under age 9 and in crashes of insured vehicles in 15 states, with data collected via insurance claims records and a telephone survey. A probability sample of 8730 crashes involving 10 195 children, representing 128 291 crashes involving 149 820 children, was collected between December 1, 1998, and November 30, 2002. Parent report was used to determine restraint type used in the crash. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the secular trend of restraint type use.

Results. Overall, for children under age 9, seat belt use decreased significantly from 49% to 36% between 1998 and 2002; for 7- and 8-year-olds, from 97% to 92%; and for 3- to 6-year-olds, from 63% to 34%. Concurrently, gains were achieved in overall child restraint use from 49% to 63%, for 7- and 8-year-olds, from 2% to 5%; and for 3- to 6-year-olds, from 35% to 65%. Child restraint use remains stable for children from birth to 2 years of age (from 97% in 1998 to 98% in 2002). Both the use of child safety seat and belt positioning booster seat increased significantly, whereas shield booster seat use decreased significantly.

Conclusion. Although considerable achievements have been realized over a short period of time, substantial inappropriate restraint still remains: 62% of children aged 4 to 8 remain inappropriately restrained in adult seat belts. Parents hear safety messages when they are relevant to their children. As a result, sustained efforts about appropriate restraint must continue to maintain and improve the gains achieved in appropriate child restraint use. The additional benefits realized by recent changes in child restraint laws remain to be evaluated.

---

Key Words: motor vehicle safety • child safety seats • seat belts • belt positioning booster seats

Abbreviations: AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • NHTSA, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration • CSS, child safety seat • BPB, belt-positioning booster seat • ShB, shield booster seat

---

Received for publication Oct 10, 2003; Accepted Dec 22, 2003.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P Farmer, A Howard, L Rothman, and A Macpherson Booster seat laws and child fatalities: a case-control study Inj. Prev., October 1, 2009; 15(5): 348 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. S. Friedman, D. Hedeker, and E. D. Richter Long-Term Effects of Repealing the National Maximum Speed Limit in the United States Am J Public Health, September 1, 2009; 99(9): 1626 - 1631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Rice and C. L. Anderson The Effectiveness of Child Restraint Systems for Children Aged 3 Years or Younger During Motor Vehicle Collisions: 1996 to 2005 Am J Public Health, February 1, 2009; 99(2): 252 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. T. Basco Jr, P. J. Hletko, L. West, and P. M. Darden Determining the Proportion of Children Too Heavy for Age-Appropriate Car Seats in a Practice-Based Research Network Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 2009; 48(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Du, A. Hayen, L. Bilston, J. Hatfield, C. Finch, and J. Brown Association Between Different Restraint Use and Rear-Seated Child Passenger Fatalities: A Matched Cohort Study Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, November 1, 2008; 162(11): 1085 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. K. Winston, M. J. Kallan, M. R. Elliott, D. Xie, and D. R. Durbin Effect of Booster Seat Laws on Appropriate Restraint Use by Children 4 to 7 Years Old Involved in Crashes Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, March 1, 2007; 161(3): 270 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. G. Simons-Morton and F. K. Winston Translational Research in Child and Adolescent Transportation Safety Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2006; 29(1): 33 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]

				I G Chen, D R Durbin, M R Elliott, M J Kallan, and F K Winston Trip characteristics of vehicle crashes involving child passengers Inj. Prev., August 1, 2005; 11(4): 219 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I G Chen, M R Elliott, D R Durbin, and F K Winston Teen drivers and the risk of injury to child passengers in motor vehicle crashes Inj. Prev., February 1, 2005; 11(1): 12 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Friedlaender and F Winston Evidence based advocacy Inj. Prev., December 1, 2004; 10(6): 324 - 326. [Full Text] [PDF]