This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, H. T.
Right arrow Articles by Bratton, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice
PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 4 April 2004, pp. e330-e334

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

All-Terrain Vehicle Legislation for Children: A Comparison of a State With and a State Without a Helmet Law

Heather T. Keenan, MDCM, MPH,* and Susan L. Bratton, MD, MPH{ddagger}

* Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
{ddagger} Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Background. All-terrain vehicles (ATVs) continue to be a source of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population despite recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics that children <16 years old not ride in or drive ATVs. ATV injuries have increased significantly in both children and adults most years since 1997.

Objective. To assess the effectiveness of ATV regulations for children on serious injuries by comparing ATV-related admissions to level I and II trauma hospitals in a state with and a state without ATV regulations.

Design. Ecologic study.

Patients. Children <16 years old who died and/or were treated in the trauma system of Pennsylvania or North Carolina after ATV crashes.

Outcome Measures. Injury types and cause of death were examined for all children. Comparisons were made by state (Pennsylvania [regulated] and North Carolina [unregulated]) for patterns of injury, place of injury, helmet use, and death.

Results. There were 1080 children identified in the trauma registries between January 1997 and July 2000. Forty-four percent required intensive care. Head injuries were the primary cause of death (45.7%). Fewer North Carolina children than Pennsylvania children (16.7% vs 35.8%) wore helmets, and they were more likely to be <11 years old (35.1% vs 27.8%). Living in North Carolina was an independent predictor for not wearing a helmet.

Conclusions. Living in Pennsylvania was associated with decreased risk factors for ATV injury such as young age and riding unhelmeted. However, despite regulations, many children suffered serious morbidity and mortality. These data support the recommendation that children <16 years old should be prohibited from riding or driving ATVs.

Key Words: all-terrain vehicles • pediatrics • injury • helmet use

Abbreviations: ATV, all-terrain vehicle • CPSC, US Consumer Product Safety Commission • EMS, emergency medical service • OCME, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner • ED, emergency department • E, external cause of injury • GCS, Glasgow Coma Score • ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification • df, degrees of freedom • OR, odds ratio • CI, confidence interval

Received for publication Sep 29, 2003; Accepted Dec 11, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
Nonfatal Injuries From Off-Road Motorcycle Riding Among Children and Teens--United States, 2001-2004
JAMA, July 19, 2006; 296(3): 273 - 274.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
S. L. Bratton
Effectiveness of Helmets in Skiers and Snowboarders
AAP Grand Rounds, March 1, 2005; 13(3): 30 - 31.
[Full Text] [PDF]