SPECIAL ARTICLE |
First Experiences With Early Intervention: A National Perspective
* Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
SRI International, Menlo Park, California
Background. Families of young children with disabilities are eligible for early intervention services as mandated by Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Although prior research has shown that families are generally satisfied with early intervention, this research has not been based on a nationally representative sample of families, nor has it systematically examined perceptions of the initial experiences entering early intervention.
Objective. This study was designed to determine families’ initial experiences in determining their child’s eligibility, interactions with medical professionals, effort required to obtain services, participation in planning for services, satisfaction with services, and interactions with professionals.
Method. We interviewed a nationally representative sample of 3338 parents of young children with or at risk for disability. All the children had recently entered an early intervention program operated under the auspices of Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act.
Results. The average age at which families reported a concern about their child was 7.4 months. A diagnosis was made, on average, 1.4 months later, the child was referred for early intervention an average of 5.2 months after the diagnosis, and the individualized family service plan was developed 1.7 months later or at an average age of 15.7 months. Most families were very positive about their entry into early intervention programs. They reported discussing their concerns with a medical professional and finding that person helpful. Families reported relative ease in accessing services, felt that services were related to their perceived needs, rated positively the professionals working in early intervention, and felt that they had a role in making key decisions about child and family goals. A small percentage of families experienced significant delays in getting services, wanted more involvement in service planning, or felt that services were inadequate, and nearly 20% were unaware of the existence of a written plan for services. Minority families, families with limited income, and families with less-educated mothers were more likely to report negative experiences.
Conclusions. We conclude that the beginning of early intervention services generally is highly successful and responsive, a finding that should give pediatricians more confidence in referring families for early intervention services. However, research and local evaluation efforts are needed to develop strategies to assure that all families receive services in a timely and appropriate fashion.
Key Words: early intervention • early identification • families • disability
Abbreviations: IDEA, Individuals With Disabilities Education Act • NEILS, National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study • IFSP, individualized family service plan
Received for publication Jan 27, 2003; Accepted Jun 21, 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Sices, T. Stancin, H. L. Kirchner, and H. Bauchner PEDS and ASQ Developmental Screening Tests May Not Identify the Same Children Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 124(4): e640 - e647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Sices, D. Drotar, A. Keilman, H. L. Kirchner, D. Roberts, and T. Stancin Communication About Child Development During Well-Child Visits: Impact of Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status Screener With or Without an Informational Video Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): e1091 - e1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. B. Guimond, M. J. Wilcox, and S. G. Lamorey The Early Intervention Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale (EIPSES): Scale Construction and Initial Psychometric Evidence Journal of Early Intervention, September 1, 2008; 30(4): 295 - 320. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Rosenberg, D. Zhang, and C. C. Robinson Prevalence of Developmental Delays and Participation in Early Intervention Services for Young Children Pediatrics, June 1, 2008; 121(6): e1503 - e1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Bailey Jr, L. Nelson, K. Hebbeler, and D. Spiker Modeling the Impact of Formal and Informal Supports for Young Children With Disabilities and Their Families Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e992 - e1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Hix-Small, K. Marks, J. Squires, and R. Nickel Impact of Implementing Developmental Screening at 12 and 24 Months in a Pediatric Practice Pediatrics, August 1, 2007; 120(2): 381 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Bailey JR, M. B. Bruder, K. Hebbeler, J. Carta, M. Defosset, C. Greenwood, L. Kahn, S. Mallik, J. Markowitz, D. Spiker, et al. Recommended Outcomes for Families of Young Children with Disabilities Journal of Early Intervention, July 1, 2006; 28(4): 227 - 251. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. P. Glascoe, M. Couture, L. Grilli, M.-N. Simard, L. Azoulay, and J. Gosselin If You Don't Ask, Parents May Not Tell: Noticing Problems vs Expressing Concerns Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2006; 160(2): 220 - 220. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. E. Feldman, M. Couture, L. Grilli, M.-N. Simard, L. Azoulay, and J. Gosselin If You Don't Ask, Parents May Not Tell: Noticing Problems vs Expressing Concerns--Reply Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, February 1, 2006; 160(2): 220 - 221. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B. Bailey Jr, K. Hebbeler, D. Spiker, A. Scarborough, S. Mallik, and L. Nelson Thirty-Six-Month Outcomes for Families of Children Who Have Disabilities and Participated in Early Intervention Pediatrics, December 1, 2005; 116(6): 1346 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. B. Bailey Jr, D. Skinner, and S. F. Warren Newborn Screening for Developmental Disabilities: Reframing Presumptive Benefit Am J Public Health, November 1, 2005; 95(11): 1889 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Ehrmann Feldman, M. Couture, L. Grilli, M.-N. Simard, L. Azoulay, and J. Gosselin When and by Whom Is Concern First Expressed for Children With Neuromotor Problems? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2005; 159(9): 882 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Cunningham Jr, D. B. Bailey Jr., A. Scarborough, K. Hebbeler, D. Spiker, and S. Mallik Delay in Referral to Early-Intervention Services Pediatrics, September 1, 2004; 114(3): 896 - 896. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
