This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, L.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens-Simon, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, L.
Right arrow Articles by Stevens-Simon, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adolescent Medicine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 3 March 2004, pp. 581-584

Teen Home Pregnancy Test Takers: More Worried or More Wishful?

Lisa Kelly, PA, Jeanelle Sheeder, BA and Catherine Stevens-Simon, MD

From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

Objective. To test the hypothesis that teenagers who have taken home pregnancy tests are more ambivalent about remaining nonpregnant than those who have not and, for this reason, use contraceptives less consistently.

Methods. A racially diverse group of 340 inadequately contracepting, nulligravida teens, 94 (28%) of whom had taken a home pregnancy test, was studied. At enrollment, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire, were counseled about contraceptive options, and were given the opportunity to initiate their method of choice. The enrollment tool assessed traditional teen-pregnancy risk factors, expectations about the effects of childbearing, common deterrents to contraceptive use, the desirability of remaining nonpregnant, and contraceptive use and plans.

Results. Home pregnancy test takers were more apt to be unsure that they wanted to remain nonpregnant (relative risk [RR]:1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.1–1.6), principally because they were more likely to lack negative expectations about the effects of childbearing on their lives (odds ratio: 2.2; 95% CI = 1.2–4.0). Although no more likely to perceive deterrents to contraceptive use, pregnancy-test-kit users were more apt to have had unprotected sexual intercourse in the past (RR:1.3; 95% CI:1.1–1.5) and to plan to do so in the future (RR:1.7; 95% CI:1.1–3.3). Group differences in the desire to remain nonpregnant accounted for differences in contraceptive behavior and plans.

Conclusion. Home pregnancy test taking should be regarded as a red flag by those who care for adolescents; although they are as capable of using contraceptives as their peers, test takers are less apt to do so because they expect less negative consequences from childbearing and, for this reason, may benefit more from discussing childbearing expectations than contraceptive options.

Key Words: home pregnancy testing • teen pregnancy • contraception • pregnancy planning

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation • RR, relative risk • CI, confidence interval • OR, odds ratio

Received for publication May 29, 2003; Accepted Oct 3, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?