How Do Primary Care Physicians Manage Children With Possible Developmental Delays? A National Survey With an Experimental Design


* Division of Behavioral Pediatrics and Psychology, Rainbow Babies and Childrens Hospital and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Division of General Pediatrics, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Division of Genetics and Developmental Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
|| Division of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Objective. Although early detection and treatment of developmental delays can improve outcome, little is known about factors that influence how primary care physicians manage young children with probable developmental delays. The objective of this study was to describe physician referral practices for children with developmental delays and to test whether the probability of referral is increased by 1) the expression of parental concern; 2) female gender in a child with language delay; 3) disruptive, as opposed to avoidant behaviors; and 4) physician characteristics, including female gender or being a pediatrician.
Methods. A cross-sectional survey was mailed to a national random sample of 800 pediatricians and 800 family practice physicians in primary care practice, using an experimental randomized block design. Recipients randomly received alternative variants of clinical vignettes, which differed only in regard to the variable specific to each of the first 3 hypotheses. Physicians answered questions about the likelihood of referral on a 5-point scale for listed referral options. Hypotheses were tested using multivariable logistic regression modeling. A total of 55% of pediatricians and 43% of family practice physicians returned the survey, for an overall response rate of 49%.
Results. A girl with language delay was 60% more likely to be referred to audiology than a boy (odds ratio: 1.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.12.3), and respondents who were female or pediatricians were more likely to refer patients. The expression of parental concern did not increase the probability of referral to diagnostic and treatment services, and avoidant rather than disruptive patient behaviors were associated with an increased probability of referral.
Conclusions. Patient gender and type of behavioral presentation seem to influence referrals to diagnostic and treatment services for young children with probable developmental delays described in clinical vignettes. These findings can guide targeted educational interventions to increase rates of detection and referral for young children with developmental delays.
Key Words: developmental delays disabilities diagnosis screening referral primary care
Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio CI, confidence interval
Received for publication Feb 4, 2003; Accepted May 16, 2003.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. F. Earls, J. E. Andrews, and S. S. Hay A Longitudinal Study of Developmental and Behavioral Screening and Referral in North Carolina's Assuring Better Child Health and Development Participating Practices Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 2009; 48(8): 824 - 833. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Marks, H. Hix-Small, K. Clark, and J. Newman Lowering Developmental Screening Thresholds and Raising Quality Improvement for Preterm Children Pediatrics, June 1, 2009; 123(6): 1516 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Sices, D. Drotar, A. Keilman, H. L. Kirchner, D. Roberts, and T. Stancin Communication About Child Development During Well-Child Visits: Impact of Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status Screener With or Without an Informational Video Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): e1091 - e1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Drotar, T. Stancin, P. H. Dworkin, L. Sices, and S. Wood Selecting Developmental Surveillance and Screening Tools Pediatr. Rev., October 1, 2008; 29(10): e52 - e58. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Crane and A. Winsler Early Autism Detection: Implications for Pediatric Practice and Public Policy Journal of Disability Policy Studies, March 1, 2008; 18(4): 245 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Harrington, P. A. Patrick, K. S. Edwards, and D. A. Brand Parental beliefs about autism: Implications for the treating physician Autism, September 1, 2006; 10(5): 452 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Krugman, D. R. Chiaramonte, and E. C. Matsui Diagnosis and Management of Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: A National Survey of Pediatricians Pediatrics, September 1, 2006; 118(3): e554 - e560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Bornstein, D. L. Putnick, and A. De Houwer Child vocabulary across the second year: Stability and continuity for reporter comparisons and a cumulative score First Language, August 1, 2006; 26(3): 299 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Tervo Parent's Reports Predict their Child's Developmental Problems Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2005; 44(7): 601 - 611. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ehrmann Feldman, M. Couture, L. Grilli, M.-N. Simard, L. Azoulay, and J. Gosselin When and by Whom Is Concern First Expressed for Children With Neuromotor Problems? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2005; 159(9): 882 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sand, M. Silverstein, F. P. Glascoe, V. B. Gupta, T. P. Tonniges, and K. G. O'Connor Pediatricians' Reported Practices Regarding Developmental Screening: Do Guidelines Work? Do They Help? Pediatrics, July 1, 2005; 116(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Bornstein and L. R. Cote "Who Is Sitting Across From Me?" Immigrant Mothers' Knowledge of Parenting and Children's Development Pediatrics, November 1, 2004; 114(5): e557 - e564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Bornstein, C.-S. Hahn, and O. M. Haynes Specific and general language performance across early childhood: Stability and gender considerations First Language, October 1, 2004; 24(3): 267 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||











