This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kosloske, A. M. Articles by Lacey, S. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kosloske, A. M. Articles by Lacey, S. R. Related Collections Surgery Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 113 No. 1 January 2004, pp. 29-34

The Diagnosis of Appendicitis in Children: Outcomes of a Strategy Based on Pediatric Surgical Evaluation

Ann M. Kosloske, MD, MPH^*,,||, C. Lance Love, MD^*, James E. Rohrer, PhD, Jane F. Goldthorn, MD^*,,|| and Stuart R. Lacey, MD^*,,||

^* Departments of Surgery
Pediatrics
Health Services Research, Texas Tech University, Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas
^|| Covenant Children’s Hospital, Lubbock, Texas

Objective. To determine the accuracy of a protocol for diagnosis of appendicitis in children based on clinical evaluation by a pediatric surgeon with selective use of diagnostic imaging studies. We performed this study because 1) current reports in the medical, pediatric, emergency medical, and surgical literature advocate imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), as the gold standard for diagnosis of appendicitis, and 2) the value of pediatric surgical evaluation early in the management of the child with possible appendicitis has rarely been emphasized.

Methods, Design, Setting, and Participants. Retrospective review of 356 children (mean age: 9.6 years; range: 1–18 years) referred to a regional pediatric surgical center for possible appendicitis from 1999 through 2001.

Interventions. Initial pediatric surgical evaluation consisted of history, physical examination, white blood cell count, differential count, and urinalysis. Children diagnosed with appendicitis underwent appendectomy without additional studies; those with equivocal findings received intravenous fluids, rest, and reevaluation after 4 to 6 hours. Imaging was used selectively by the pediatric surgeon.

Outcome Measures. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the protocol based on final diagnoses; rate of appendiceal perforation; and rate of negative appendectomy.

Results. Of 356 children evaluated for appendicitis, 220 (62%) had an appendectomy. Two-hundred nine (95%) had histologically proven appendicitis, and 11 (5%) had a normal appendix. Of the 209 children with appendicitis, 139 (66%) had acute appendicitis, 34 (16%) had advanced appendicitis without perforation, and 36 (17%) had advanced appendicitis with perforation. Appendectomy was performed after initial evaluation in 195 (89%) of the 220 children and after a period of supportive care and observation in 25 (11%) of 220. One hundred thirty-six children (38%) did not have an appendectomy and were discharged with other diagnoses. The sensitivity of this protocol was 99%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value was 95%, and negative predictive value was 99%. The accuracy was 97% compared with an accuracy of 82% for ultrasound alone and 90% for CT scan alone.

Conclusions. These data show that a protocol based on clinical evaluation by a pediatric surgeon with selective use of imaging was highly accurate for the diagnosis of appendicitis in children. Low rates of negative appendectomy (5%) and perforation (17%) were achieved without the potential costs and radiation exposure of excess imaging.

---

Key Words: appendicitis • appendectomy • pediatric surgeon • CT • computed tomography

Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography • US, ultrasound • WBC, white blood cell

---

Received for publication Mar 3, 2003; Accepted Apr 10, 2003.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Garcia, M. Hernanz-Schulman, D. L. Bennett, S. E. Morrow, C. Yu, and J. H. Kan Suspected Appendicitis in Children: Diagnostic Importance of Normal Abdominopelvic CT Findings with Nonvisualized Appendix Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Miller CT Scans on Children: Is This a Problem? Clinical Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 47(3): 220 - 223. [PDF]

				R. H. Gottlieb Imaging for Whom: Patient or Physician? Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1399 - 1403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Swarr and R. Keren Comparison of Alternative Diagnostic Approaches for Managing Appendicitis in Children: The Effect of Disease Prevalence and Spectrum Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2): 513 - 514. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Clinical Assessment, Limited Imaging Diagnose Appendicitis Journal Watch Dermatology, May 25, 2004; 2004(525): 8 - 8. [Full Text]

				Diagnosing Appendicitis in Children: What's the Best Strategy? Journal Watch Dermatology, March 3, 2004; 2004(303): 9 - 9. [Full Text]

				Clinical Assessment, Limited Imaging Diagnose Appendicitis Journal Watch Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, March 1, 2004; 2004(301): 1 - 1. [Full Text]

				Diagnosing Appendicitis in Children: What's the Best Strategy? Journal Watch (General), February 6, 2004; 2004(206): 4 - 4. [Full Text]