This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lieu, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lieu, T. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 5 November 2003, pp. 1076-1082

Adoption of Reminder and Recall Messages for Immunizations by Pediatricians and Public Health Clinics

Cheryl D. Tierney, MD, MPH*, Hussain Yusuf, MBBS, MPH{ddagger}, Shawn R. McMahon, MD, MPH{ddagger}, Donna Rusinak, BS§, Megan A. O’ Brien, MPH§, Mehran S. Massoudi, PhD, MPH{ddagger} and Tracy A. Lieu, MD, MPH§,||

* Harvard Combined Pediatric Health Services Research Fellowship Program, Boston, Massachusetts
{ddagger} National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
§ Center for Child Healthcare Studies, Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare and Harvard Medical School
|| Division of General Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Objective. Strong scientific evidence and national recommendations support the use of reminder and recall messages to improve immunization coverage rates, yet reports have suggested that only a minority of pediatric practices use such messages. Our aims were to 1) determine the proportions of pediatric practices and public clinics that currently use practice-based reminder or recall messages and routinely undergo immunization assessment efforts, 2) evaluate barriers and supports to implementing these practices, and 3) identify predictors of either current use or plans for future adoption of these practices.

Methods. This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods in sequential phases. In the qualitative phase, we conducted semistructured, open-ended interviews with a convenience sample of 18 clinician-administrators representing adopters and nonadopters of these messages in both private practices and public health clinics. In the subsequent quantitative phase, we mailed a structured, closed-ended survey to national samples of randomly selected pediatricians (n = 600) and public clinics (n = 600).

Results. Response rates were 75% for pediatricians and 77% for public clinics. Among pediatricians, 38% were conducting regular assessments of immunization coverage but only 16% were currently using routine reminder or recall messages. Among public clinics, 85% were conducting regular assessments and 51% were using reminder or recall messages. Among pediatricians’ practices, the most commonly reported barriers to the adoption of reminder or recall messages were lack of time and funding and the inability to identify children at specified ages. For pediatricians’ practices, the strongest predictors of current use of reminder or recall messages were having a champion who led efforts to improve immunization delivery (odds ratio: 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–3.18) and current use of regular immunization assessments (odds ratio: 2.30; 95% confidence interval: 1.33–3.84). Likewise, for public health clinics, having a champion to lead immunization improvement efforts and believing that their current system needed improvement was associated with current use of reminder or recall messages.

Conclusions. Reminder and recall messages remain underused by both pediatricians and public health clinics. Promising strategies to promote adoption of these approaches in both the private and the public sectors include identifying and training champions to promote immunization delivery improvement efforts and helping practices develop methods to identify children at specific ages.

Key Words: immunizations • interventions • quality of care • recall • reminder • assessment

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio • CI, confidence interval

Received for publication Oct 23, 2002; Accepted Apr 24, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CLIN PEDIATRHome page
E. J. Slora, J. M. Steffes, D. Harris, H. W. Clegg, D. Norton, P. M. Darden, S. A. Sullivan, and R. C. Wasserman
Improving Pediatric Practice Immunization Rates Through Distance-Based Quality Improvement: A Feasibility Trial from PROS
Clinical Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 47(1): 25 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. G. Fiks, R. W. Grundmeier, L. M. Biggs, A. R. Localio, and E. A. Alessandrini
Impact of Clinical Alerts Within an Electronic Health Record on Routine Childhood Immunization in an Urban Pediatric Population
Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): 707 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. Guttmann, D. Manuel, P. T. Dick, T. To, K. Lam, and T. A. Stukel
Volume Matters: Physician Practice Characteristics and Immunization Coverage Among Young Children Insured Through a Universal Health Plan
Pediatrics, March 1, 2006; 117(3): 595 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
K. R. Broder, A. MacNeil, S. Malone, B. Schwartz, A. L. Baughman, T. V. Murphy, L. K. Pickering, and J. S. Moran
Who's Calling the Shots? Pediatricians' Adherence to the 2001-2003 Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine-Shortage Recommendations
Pediatrics, June 1, 2005; 115(6): 1479 - 1487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted: 14 Nov 2003 to 30 Jan 2004
Evid. Based Nurs., April 1, 2004; 7(2): e2 - e2.
[Full Text] [PDF]