Dating of Bruises in Children: An Assessment of Physician Accuracy
* Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Chalmers Research Group, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|| Child and Youth Protection Program, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, and Department of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Objective. To determine whether physicians can estimate accurately the age of an accidental bruise on direct physical examination.
Methods. Children who presented to the emergency department of a children’s hospital with accidental bruises of known age and origin had demographic data and information about their injury recorded. History-blinded emergency pediatricians, other physicians, and trainees (fellows, residents, and medical students) independently examined the bruised area and recorded injury characteristics and age estimation and ranked characteristics that influenced their estimation.
Results. Fifty children with accidental bruises were enrolled. Emergency pediatricians’ accuracy of age estimation within 24 hours of actual age was 47.6%. Individual emergency pediatrician’s accuracy ranged from 0% to 100%, and the interobserver reliability was poor (
= –0.03). Accuracy within 24 hours of actual age was 29.4% for other physicians and 36.8% for trainees, which was similar to the emergency pediatricians. Observers reported using color primarily to estimate age, followed by tenderness and then swelling; however, none of these factors was significantly correlated with accuracy.
Conclusions. Physician estimates of bruise age are highly inaccurate within 24 hours of the actual age of the injury. Large individual variability and poor interrater reliability also suggest that caution must be used when interpreting these estimates. This study supports earlier studies, urging extreme caution in estimating bruise age, even when such estimates are based on direct examination of the injured area.
Key Words: children • bruising • abuse • emergency
Received for publication Jul 18, 2002; Accepted Mar 1, 2003.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. L. Peters, S. P. Starling, M. L. Barnes-Eley, and K. W. Heisler The Presence of Bruising Associated With Fractures Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2008; 162(9): 877 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Sheridan and K. R. Nash Acute Injury Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence Victims Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2007; 8(3): 281 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S Maguire, M K Mann, J Sibert, and A Kemp Can you age bruises accurately in children? A systematic review Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2005; 90(2): 187 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T J David Avoidable pitfalls when writing medical reports for court proceedings in cases of suspected child abuse Arch. Dis. Child., September 1, 2004; 89(9): 799 - 804. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Caution Needed in Determining Age of Bruises in Children Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, November 12, 2003; 2003(1112): 5 - 5. [Full Text]
|
|
eLetters:
Read all eLetters
- Error on quoting reference
- Loretta Light
- Pediatrics Online, 22 Mar 2004 [Full text]
- Erratum
- Erika D Bariciak
- Pediatrics Online, 15 Apr 2004 [Full text]
