This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Shah, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart & Blood Vessels
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 3 September 2003, pp. e228-e233

ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

Efficacy of Implantable Loop Recorders in Establishing Symptom-Rhythm Correlation in Young Patients With Syncope and Palpitations

Joseph Rossano, MD*, Beatrijs Bloemers{ddagger}, Narayanswami Sreeram, MD{ddagger}, Seshadri Balaji, MD§ and Maully J. Shah, MBBS*

* Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
{ddagger} Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital
§ Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health Sciences University

Objective. To evaluate efficacy of the recently introduced implantable loop recorder (ILR) in establishing symptom-rhythm correlation in young patients with syncope, near syncope, palpitations, and acute life-threatening events (ALTEs).

Methods. A retrospective study was conducted with patients with ILR from 3 pediatric centers. Inclusion criteria were age ≤25 years and a minimum follow-up of 1 month. All ILR-stored events were analyzed regularly for the presence or absence of an arrhythmia at the time of the symptomatic event.

Results. Twenty-one patients (12 male, 9 female) with an average age of 12.3 ± 5.3 years (range: 0.8–22 years) were included in the study. Five (24%) patients had structural heart disease, 2 (10%) had a family history of sudden cardiac death, 3 (14%) had QT prolongation on electrocardiogram, and 11 had no cardiovascular disease. Indications for ILR were recurrent syncope and near syncope (n = 15), palpitations (n = 2), and ALTE (n = 2). Fourteen (67%) patients continued to have symptoms, and 7 (33%) had no symptoms after ILR over a follow-up period of 8.4 ± 4.7 months (range: 1.9–16 months). Symptom-rhythm correlation was possible in all 14 patients who continued to have symptoms (supraventricular tachycardia in 4, ventricular tachycardia in 2, torsades de points in 1, asystole in 1, junctional bradycardia in 1, and sinus rhythm in 5).

Conclusions. ILR is useful in determining the presence or absence of an arrhythmia during symptoms of syncope, near syncope, and palpitations as well as ALTEs in patients with and without structural heart disease when conventional diagnostic testing, such as electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and/or external loop recording, is inconclusive.

Key Words: implantable loop recorder • arrhythmias • syncope • palpitations

Abbreviations: HUT, head-up tilt • ECG, electrocardiogram • ELR, external loop recorder • EPS, electrophysiology study • ILR, implantable loop recorder • ALTE, acute life-threatening event • EEG, electroencephalogram • SVT, supraventricular tachycardia • VT, ventricular tachycardia • RFA, radiofrequency ablation • LQTS, long QT syndrome

Received for publication Oct 31, 2002; Accepted Apr 24, 2003.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 EuropaceHome page
D. Kenny, S. Chakrabarti, A. Ranasinghe, A. Chambers, R. Martin, and G. Stuart
Single-centre use of implantable loop recorders in patients with congenital heart disease
Europace, March 1, 2009; 11(3): 303 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
R. H Pass and L. Liberman
The implantable loop recorder in children: searching for indications
Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 832 - 833.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 HeartHome page
B Yeung and K McLeod
The implantable loop recorder in children
Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 888 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Sreeram, F. Hitchcock, and G. Bennink
Abdominal Implantation of Loop Recorders in Infants and Children
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 726 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]