Percutaneous Lidocaine Administration Via a New Iontophoresis System in Children: Tolerability and Absence of Systemic Bioavailability
,
,||
* Departments of Pediatrics
Pharmacology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri
Divisions of Pediatric Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology
|| Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Childrens Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri
¶ Becton Dickinson Medical Systems, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey
Objective. Rapid achievement of dermal anesthesia in pediatric practice without discomfort is both desirable and difficult. The Northstar Iontophoretic Drug Delivery System (IDDS) is designed to achieve this objective in 10 minutes using a current of 1.78 mA, compared with the 40 to 60 minutes required for traditional percutaneous methods (eg, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics or EMLA cream). For evaluating the tolerance of this IDDS in pediatrics, 12 healthy children (515 years, 4 girls and 8 boys, 10 white, weight 1979 kg) were evaluated.
Methods. An open-label trial with random applications of IDDS containing lidocaine (100 mg of 10%) and epinephrine (1.05 mg of 1:10 000) to 3 of the 4 possible sites (back, chest, dorsum of hand, and antecubital fossa) was conducted. Three successive applications (time = 0, 3 hours and 3.5 hours) were performed in each subject, with repeated blood sampling (n = 12 over 10 hours) for assessment of plasma lidocaine concentrations. Skin evaluation (by Draize scoring) at both anode and cathode sites was performed at 10 and 24 hours.
Results. Few of the subjects (0%28%) experienced any dermal abnormalities at 10 hours. These findings were maintained at the 24-hour follow-up evaluation with the vast majority of subjects (92%100%) having no evidence of erythema or edema irrespective of application site. Erythema associated with the anode seemed to be more prominent when the study device was applied to either the chest or the back as compared with the antecubital fossa or dorsum of the hand. No subjects complained of pain/discomfort associated with IDDS delivery. Plasma lidocaine levels in all subjects were below 10 ng/mL at all time points.
Conclusions. The IDDS seems not to deliver a significant, systemic dose of lidocaine and to be well tolerated and potentially suitable for clinical use in pediatric subjects.
Key Words: iontophoresis lidocaine percutaneous
Received for publication Mar 3, 2002; Accepted Feb 20, 2003.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. T. Zempsky Pharmacologic Approaches for Reducing Venous Access Pain in Children Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(Supplement_3): S140 - S153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Final Report of the Safety Assessment of Alcohol Denat., Including SD Alcohol 3-A, SD Alcohol 30, SD Alcohol 39, SD Alcohol 39-B, SD Alcohol 39-C, SD Alcohol 40, SD Alcohol 40-B, and SD Alcohol 40-C, and the Denaturants, Quassin, Brucine Sulfate/Brucine, and Denatonium Benzoate International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 2008; 27(1_suppl): 1 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Power Fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system (ITS): clinical application of iontophoretic technology in the management of acute postoperative pain Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2007; 98(1): 4 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







