This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rickert, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rickert, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, M. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Infectious Disease & Immunity
PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 6 June 2003, pp. 1297-1302

Counting the Shots: A Model for Immunization Screening and Referral in Nonmedical Settings

Donna L. Rickert, MA, DrPH, Abigail M. Shefer, MD, Lance E. Rodewald, MD and Mary M. McCauley, MTSC

From the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Background. Clinics of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) have become important partners in efforts to improve vaccination coverage in low income children. However, the time required to assess all antigens in each child’s vaccination record may exceed the capacity of many of these clinics. Seeking a solution, experts recommended assessing up-to-date (UTD) status only for the diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and treating this as a proxy measure for all vaccines in the childhood schedule. Whether this single vaccine screening method represents an acceptable alternative to the traditional multiple-vaccine method as a basis for improving overall immunization coverage levels in this vulnerable population has not been demonstrated.

Objective. To evaluate the validity of the proposed simplified method for assessing immunization status in a nationally representative population of infants and children who had ever been enrolled in WIC before 35 months old.

Methods. This was a cross-sectional analysis of the 2000 National Immunization Survey representing children ages 3 to 24 months who had ever been enrolled in WIC. For the 6277 children in the study population, we compared personal records of completion status for DTaP with personal records of completion status for all immunizations appropriate for age in the combination 4:3:1:3 schedule to see which of the 2 (single vs multiple screening) methods would better predict the child’s true (provider-reported) status for the 4:3:1:3 series. The main outcome measures were the comparative sensitivity, specificity, and overall test efficiency of the 2 methods in correctly identifying underimmunized WIC children.

Results. Completion status for DTaP was less sensitive than completion status for all vaccinations in correctly identifying truly underimmunized children (sensitivity = 70% and 77%, respectively). However, it was more specific in correctly identifying children who were truly UTD for age (specificity = 86% and 82%, respectively). The 2 methods were essentially identical with respect to overall test efficiency (82% and 81% for DTaP assessment and assessment of all vaccines, respectively).

Conclusions. Given limited resources to do immunization screening and referral in nonmedical settings such as WIC, simplifying the process by using DTaP from the personal vaccination record as a proxy for the 4:3:1:3 series is a viable option. Loss in sensitivity may well be offset by gains in the capacity of WIC clinics to screen more children.

Key Words: immunization • Women • Infants and Children • evaluation • underserved • sensitivity • specificity • policy • evaluation • preventive services

Abbreviations: WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children • DTaP, diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis • MMR, measles-mumps-rubella • Hib, Haemophilus influenzae type b • NIS, National Immunization Survey • UTD, up-to-date

Received for publication Oct 23, 2002; Accepted Dec 18, 2002.