This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow P3Rs: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when P3Rs are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Christakis, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 5 May 2003, pp. 976-980

Resident Documentation Discrepancies in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Aaron E. Carroll, MD*,{ddagger}, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, MD{ddagger},§, Eamon O’Reilly and Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH{ddagger},||

* Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
{ddagger} Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
§ Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
|| Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

--> Context. Medical errors are common and potentially dangerous. Little is known about the role of documentation errors.

Objective. To determine the proportion of resident physician progress notes that contained discrepancies, and to identify predictors of such discrepancies.

Design/Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of resident physician progress notes over 40 random days in a 4-month period in a neonatal intensive care unit. Using predetermined criteria, we compared resident documentation of patient weights, medications, and vascular lines to other sources of information and recorded the numbers of documentation discrepancies.

Results. There were discrepancies in 209 (61.7%) notes with respect to weight, vascular lines, or medications. Discrepancies occurred in the documentation of medications in 103 (27.7%) progress notes, of vascular lines in 119 (33.9%) progress notes, and of weights in 45 (13.3%) progress notes. Notes both omitted information regarding medications (18.2%) and vascular lines (13.9%) and documented inaccurate information regarding medications (18.6%) and vascular lines (30.1%). Patients with more medications or vascular lines, and with longer lengths of stay, were significantly more likely to have higher rates of documentation errors.

Conclusions. Daily progress notes written by resident physicians in the neonatal intensive care unit often contain inaccurate, or omit pertinent, information. Alternative means or methods of documentation are warranted.

Key Words: resident • documentation • errors • NICU

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • prn, as needed • IRR, incident rate ratio • CI, confidence interval

Received for publication Jun 10, 2002; Accepted Sep 12, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
J E Sheppard, L C E Weidner, S Zakai, S Fountain-Polley, and J Williams
Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping
Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 204 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Snijders, R A van Lingen, A Molendijk, and W P F Fetter
Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2007; 92(5): F391 - F398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
J. E. Gray, G. Suresh, R. Ursprung, W. H. Edwards, J. Nickerson, P. H. Shiono, P. Plsek, D. A. Goldmann, and J. Horbar
Patient Misidentification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Quantification of Risk
Pediatrics, January 1, 2006; 117(1): e43 - e47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
T. Garrido, L. Jamieson, Y. Zhou, A. Wiesenthal, and L. Liang
Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study
BMJ, March 12, 2005; 330(7491): 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
S Manzar, A K Nair, M Govind Pai, and S Al-Khusaiby
Use of abbreviations in daily progress notes
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2004; 89(4): F374 - F374.
[Full Text]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
A. E. Carroll, P. Tarczy-Hornoch, E. O'Reilly, and D. A. Christakis
The Effect of Point-of-Care Personal Digital Assistant Use on Resident Documentation Discrepancies
Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 450 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AAP Grand RoundsHome page
F. H. Levy
Excess Hospitalization Costs Attributable to Medical Injuries
AAP Grand Rounds, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 7 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
P. J. S. Koo
Acute Pain Management
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 231 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 PediatricsHome page
G. Suresh
Don't Believe Everything You Read in the Patient's Chart
Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1108 - 1109.
[Full Text] [PDF]