This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Carroll, A. E. Articles by Christakis, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Carroll, A. E. Articles by Christakis, D. A. Related Collections Office Practice Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 5 May 2003, pp. 976-980

Resident Documentation Discrepancies in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Aaron E. Carroll, MD^*,, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, MD^,, Eamon O’Reilly and Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH^,||

^* Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
^|| Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

--> Context. Medical errors are common and potentially dangerous. Little is known about the role of documentation errors.

Objective. To determine the proportion of resident physician progress notes that contained discrepancies, and to identify predictors of such discrepancies.

Design/Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of resident physician progress notes over 40 random days in a 4-month period in a neonatal intensive care unit. Using predetermined criteria, we compared resident documentation of patient weights, medications, and vascular lines to other sources of information and recorded the numbers of documentation discrepancies.

Results. There were discrepancies in 209 (61.7%) notes with respect to weight, vascular lines, or medications. Discrepancies occurred in the documentation of medications in 103 (27.7%) progress notes, of vascular lines in 119 (33.9%) progress notes, and of weights in 45 (13.3%) progress notes. Notes both omitted information regarding medications (18.2%) and vascular lines (13.9%) and documented inaccurate information regarding medications (18.6%) and vascular lines (30.1%). Patients with more medications or vascular lines, and with longer lengths of stay, were significantly more likely to have higher rates of documentation errors.

Conclusions. Daily progress notes written by resident physicians in the neonatal intensive care unit often contain inaccurate, or omit pertinent, information. Alternative means or methods of documentation are warranted.

Key Words: resident • documentation • errors • NICU

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • prn, as needed • IRR, incident rate ratio • CI, confidence interval

---

Received for publication Jun 10, 2002; Accepted Sep 12, 2002.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. R.S. Gordon, T. Wahls, R. C. Carlos, I. I. Pipinos, G. E. Rosenthal, and P. Cram Failure to Recognize Newly Identified Aortic Dilations in a Health Care System With an Advanced Electronic Medical Record Ann Intern Med, July 7, 2009; 151(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J E Sheppard, L C E Weidner, S Zakai, S Fountain-Polley, and J Williams Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping Arch. Dis. Child., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 204 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Snijders, R A van Lingen, A Molendijk, and W P F Fetter Incidents and errors in neonatal intensive care: a review of the literature Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2007; 92(5): F391 - F398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Gray, G. Suresh, R. Ursprung, W. H. Edwards, J. Nickerson, P. H. Shiono, P. Plsek, D. A. Goldmann, and J. Horbar Patient Misidentification in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Quantification of Risk Pediatrics, January 1, 2006; 117(1): e43 - e47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Garrido, L. Jamieson, Y. Zhou, A. Wiesenthal, and L. Liang Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study BMJ, March 12, 2005; 330(7491): 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S Manzar, A K Nair, M Govind Pai, and S Al-Khusaiby Use of abbreviations in daily progress notes Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 2004; 89(4): F374 - F374. [Full Text]

				A. E. Carroll, P. Tarczy-Hornoch, E. O'Reilly, and D. A. Christakis The Effect of Point-of-Care Personal Digital Assistant Use on Resident Documentation Discrepancies Pediatrics, March 1, 2004; 113(3): 450 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H. Levy Excess Hospitalization Costs Attributable to Medical Injuries AAP Grand Rounds, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 7 - 8. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. S. Koo Acute Pain Management Journal of Pharmacy Practice, August 1, 2003; 16(4): 231 - 248. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Suresh Don't Believe Everything You Read in the Patient's Chart Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1108 - 1109. [Full Text] [PDF]